Table 2

Distribution of average responses with 95% CI to the six questions on user satisfaction and four technological feasibility questions at week 1 and week 12 and the difference between week 12 and week 1 (N=11)

Weekly follow-up questions
(utility and usability)
Week 1
Value (95% CI)
Week 12
Value (95% CI)
Difference
Value (95% CI)
Difference
% (95% CI)
Technical feasibility (usability)
 VETT on mobile phone is simple and intuitive to use.64 (48 to 79)79 (71 to 86)1523
 Reminders of tasks arrive at the agreed upon time.68 (49 to 87)73 (54 to 91)57
 It is easy and intuitive to answer the reminders.51 (35 to 67)83 (77 to 90)3263
 It is easy and intuitive to answer that the task is done.61 (41 to 80)83 (77 to 90)2236
Average usability (CI)61 (54 to 68)80 (75 to 84)19 (7 to 30)*32 (9 to 55)
User satisfaction (utility)
 VETT on mobile phone motivates me.65 (59 to 83)73 (64 to 83)812
 The established goal was right for me.80 (71 to 89)86 (80 to 91)68
 The tasks are correctly selected.73 (64 to 82)85 (76 to 94)1216
 The reminders are right for me.69 (53 to 85)83 (75 to 90)1420
 The weekly feedback reminder is useful.67 (49 to 86)83 (74 to 91)1624
 The weekly summary is perceived as useful.74 (57 to 91)74 (58 to 90)00
Average utility (CI)71 (67 to 76)81 (76 to 85)9 (5 to 14)13 (6 to 20)
  • All values are estimated on a scale of 0–100 (0=total disagreement, 100=total agreement).

  • *P=0.04.