Table 3C

Structural equation model for SES, MVPA and BMI on SBP in the pooled sample of urban and rural women

Effect of: n=867OutcomeDirect effects (95% CI)Indirect effects (95% CI)Total effects (95% CI)Proportion of total effect mediated
Household assetsSBP via BMI0.23 (−0.08 to 0.54)0.23 (0.10 to 0.35)***0.46 (0.15 to 0.76)**0.5
BMI via MVPA0.20 (0.05 to 0.34)**−0.05 (−0.100 to 0.003)0.15 (0.01 to 0.29)*0.25†
MVPA−144.83 (−170.55 to −119.12)***−144.83 (−170.55 to −119.12)***
MVPASBP via BMI−0.001 (−0.002 to −0.0005)**0.0001 (-0.0000 to 0.0002)−0.001 (−0.002 to −0.0003)**0.1†
BMISBP0.35 (0.21 to 0.49)***0.35 (0.21 to 0.49)***
  • Pooled Fit Indices: LR test of model versus saturated: χ2 (4)=24.829, probability >χ2=0.000; RMSEA=0.077; CFI=0.89, Comparative Fit Index; TLI=0.75, Tucker-Lewis Index; SRMR=0.033: standardised root mean squared residual, CD=0.137, coefficient of determination.

  • Adjusted for age; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.

  • †Assessed using the absolute values for both indirect and direct effects.

  • BMI, body mass index; LR test, likelihood ratio test; MVPA, moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity; RMSEA, root mean squared error of approximation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SES, socioeconomic status.