Table 3

Adjusted logistic regression model assessing the association between Z drug use and TOGH in the subsample of patients with HoNOS data present

All modalitiesTactileOlfactoryGustatory
OR (95% CI)P valuesOR (95% CI)P valuesOR (95% CI)P valuesOR (95% CI)P values
Z drugs1.80
(1.40 to 2.32)		<0.0011.86
(1.38 to 2.51)		<0.0011.60
(1.01 to 2.54)		0.0432.19
(0.86 to 5.55)		0.099
Gender0.90
(0.70 to 1.14)		0.3821.16
(0.86 to 1.55)		0.324––––
Age (years)
  32–41––––Ref––
  18–31––––1.52
(0.84 to 2.73)		0.163––
  42–51––––1.07
(0.58 to 1.96)		0.835––
  51–65––––0.92
(0.49 to 1.75)		0.795––
Ethnicity
  WhiteRefRefRef––
  Black1.66
(1.27 to 2.16)		<0.0011.86
(1.36 to 2.55)		<0.0011.54
(0.95 to 2.50)		0.078––
  Other1.28
(0.89 to 1.83)		0.1821.33
(0.86 to 2.04)		0.1941.22
(0.63 to 2.36)		0.549––
Diagnosis
  F3RefRefRefRef
  F24.67
(3.39 to 6.43)		<0.0013.84
(2.65 to 5.55)		<0.0018.19
(4.14 to 16.17)		<0.0014.39
(1.48 to 13.04)		0.008
  F2/F33.68
(2.55 to 5.31)		<0.0012.63
(1.70 to 4.10)		<0.0019.24
(4.45 to 19.01)		<0.0015.01
(1.46 to 17.21)		0.010
Hypnotic use1.59
(1.22 to 2.06)		0.0011.76
(1.29 to 2.40)		<0.0011.26
(0.79 to 2.01)		0.3340.97
(0.38 to 2.49)		0.954
Non-serotonin antidepressants0.86
(0.57 to 1.05)		0.4550.98
(0.62 to 1.53)		0.9200.97
(0.48 to 1.98)		0.940––
HoNOS total1.03
(1.01 to 1.04)		0.0051.03
(1.01 to 1.50)		0.0020.99
(0.96 to 1.03)		0.9720.94
(0.86 to 1.02)		0.130
HoNOS problem with drug and alcohol––1.03
(0.71 to 1.50)		0.861––––

  • En dash denoted variable not entered in regression model.

  • HoNOS, Health of the Nations Outcome Scales; TOGH, tactile, olfactory or gustatory hallucinations.