Table 1

Model comparisons

Modelsχ2 dfCFITLIRMSEAAICModel comparison∆ df∆ χ2
Model 1382.864**990.9350.9110.059488.864
Model 2388.906**1000.9340.9110.060492.9061 vs 216.04*
Model 3452.720**1010.9200.8920.065554.7202 vs 3163.81**
Model 4501.158**1030.9090.8800.069599.1583 vs 4248.44**
Model 51655.889**1700.7400.6780.1041775.8894 vs 5671154.73**
  • n=336. * P < 0.05 ; ** P < 0.01 . CFI,  Comparative Fit Index ; TLI,  Tucker-Lewis Index ; RMSEA,  Root Mean Square Error of Approximation ; AIC,  Akaike Information Criterion .

  • Model 1: exemplary behaviours (EB), individualised consideration (IC), intellectual stimulation (IS) and contingent reward (CR) were included as four first-order factors under one second-order factor for active leadership (AL), and passive leadership (PL) was intercorrelated with AL.

  • Model 2: IC and IS were collapsed into one factor, resulting in three first-order factors for the AL second-order factor and PL was intercorrelated with AL.

  • Model 3: EB, IC and IS were collapsed into one factor, resulting in two first-order factors for the AL second-order factor, and PL was intercorrelated with AL.

  • Model 4: all the active factors (transformational leadership subfactors and CR) were collapsed into one first-order factor, and PL was intercorrelated with AL.

  • Model 5: all items loaded on one single factor.