Table 3

Proof-of-concept outcomes in the comparator cohort compared with the low-friction (LF) cohort

Comparator cohortLF cohortES (95% CI)*P values
(N=90)(N=131)
Primary outcome
 Regrafted (proportion yes (%))6/90 (6.7)5/131 (3.8)0.56 (0.16 to 1.88)0.33
Secondary outcomes
 Reported graft loss
  Proportion >0% (%)36/90 (40)20/131 (15)0.27 (0.14 to 0.51)<0.001
  Proportion >5% (%)22/90 (24)15/131 (11)0.40 (0.19 to 0.82)0.01
  Proportion >10% (%)15/90 (17)9/131 (7)0.37 (0.15 to 0.88)0.02
Length of stay (LoS)
 First inpatient LoS
  Median (95% CI)6 (3–13)7 (3–16)0 (−2.00 to 1.00)0.51
  Mean (95% CI)§11.5 (15.4)12.2 (14.7)−0.64 (−4.69 to 3.40)
 First inpatient LoS/% BSA
  Median (95% CI)2 (0.9–4)2 (1.2–3.3)0 (−0.42 to 0.50)‡0.87
 Total burn service LoS
  Median (95% CI)33.5 (25.5–69.5) n=8832 (18–51) n=1295 (−2.00 to 12.00)‡0.12
  • *For regraft and graft loss, OR and 95% CI are reported. For LoS, median and mean differences with 95% CI are reported. Text highlighted in bold shows 95% CI not crossing 1. Comparator cohort used as control cohort.

  • †P values stem from two-sample proportion tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests.

  • ‡CI for generalised Hodges-Lehmann median differences.

  • §Used for cost analysis.

  • BSA, body surface area; ES, effect size.