Summary scores
| Facilities | Countries | Mean (95% CI) | Median (IQR range) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | |||||||||||||||||||||
| H1 | H2 | H3 | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H1 | H2 | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | |||
| 1. Internal organisation | 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 3 | 2 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 (1.3 to 2.6) | 2.1 (1.7–2.5) |
| 2. Case identification | 2.3 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3 | 2 | 2.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.7 | 3 | 1.7 (1.0 to 2.4) | 2.8 (2.0–3.0) |
| 3. Respect of ground rules | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2.2 (1.4 to 2.9) | 2.2 (1.5–3.0) |
| 4. Case presentation | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 2 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 3 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.7 (1.0 to 2.3) | 1.8 (1.1–2.2) |
| 5. Inclusion of users’ views | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0 | 3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1.4 | 0 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 (0.1 to 2.0) | 1.2 (0.3–1.7) |
| 6. Case analysis | 1.5 | 1 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 (0.8 to 2.3) | 1.5 (1.1–2.0) |
| 7. Development of recommendations | 0.3 | 1 | 2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0 | 2 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 1 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 3 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 (0.6 to 2.3) | 1.7 (1.0–1.9) |
| 8. Implementation of recommendations | 0 | 0.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.7 | 2 | 2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0 | 3 | 0.8 | 2 | 0.5 | 3 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 1.4 (0.3 to 2.4) | 1.5 (0.8–2.3) |
| 9. Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.1 (0.4 to 2.2) | 1.5 (0.0–1.9) |
| 10. Documentation and results diffusion | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1.7 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.7 | 1 | 1.2 (0.5 to 2.0) | 1.1 (0.7–1.9) |
| 11. Ensuring quality in the NMCR | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA* | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 (0.1 to 1.2) | 1.0 (0.1–1.2) |
Red, scores between 0.0 and 0.9; yellow, scores between 1.0 and 1.9; green, scores between 2.0 and 3.0.
*In country B piloting started only 6 months before the quality assessment; for this reason the domain 11 was considered not applicable (NA).
NMCR, near-miss case review.