Table 5

Potential variables to be included in IPTW

Potential variableAssociation with reoffending within 18 monthsAssociation with allocation to care farmInclude in IPTW
HR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Age at recruitment: decades0.8 (0.6 to 1.07)0.87 (0.62 to 1.22)
Gender: female versus male0.58 (0.27 to 1.26) 0.07 (0.02 to 0.32)
Has disability: yes versus no0.95 (0.42 to 2.18) 2.84 (1.11 to 7.26)
Probation type: NPS versus CRC 0.08 (0.01 to 0.6) 0.3 (0.08 to 1.09)Yes
Used substances during the past 4 weeks: yes versus no 2.06 (1.08 to 3.93) 3.53 (1.53 to 8.16) Yes
Smoker: yes versus no 2.44 (1.11 to 5.36) 2.72 (1.11 to 6.67) Yes
OGRS at disposal: unit increase 1.02 (1.01 to 1.03) 1.02 (1.01 to 1.04) Yes
Index of Multiple Deprivation: compared with most deprived quintile within cohort1.01.0
 22.87 (0.99 to 8.26) 5 (1.17 to 21.46)
 31.69 (0.53 to 5.34) 7 (1.64 to 29.85)
 41.58 (0.5 to 4.99)3.27 (0.72 to 14.73)
 5—least deprived1.34 (0.42 to 4.21)2.72 (0.61 to 12.1)
White British according to nDelius: no versus yes0.44 (0.17 to 1.15) 0.14 (0.03 to 0.61)
Disposal type: suspended sentence order versus CO0.62 (0.3 to 1.28)1.56 (0.7 to 3.44)
Healthy foods are enjoyable: compared with strongly agree/agree1.01.0Yes
 Neither agree nor disagree 2.45 (1.17 to 5.14) 3.51 (1.3 to 9.51)
 Disagree/strongly disagree2.95 (0.88 to 9.84) 11.5 (1.22 to 108.02)
  • Bolded values show significant.

  • CO, community order; CRC, Community Rehabilitation Company; IPTW, inverse-probability treatment weight; NPS, National Probation Service; OGRS, Offender Group Reconviction Scores.