Table 4

Summary of quality and outcome measures of selected RCTs in reviews Calamita et al, Penagos et al and added Pham-Thi et al 29 32 44

ReviewRCTEligibleJadad scoreReported on asthma symptomsReported on exacerbationsReported on asthma controlReported on disease-specific quality of lifeReported on lung function (FEV1)
Randomisation*Blinding†Withdrawals‡Total
Calamita29 Bahceciler et al 54Yes1113+
Hirsch et al 55 Yes2114+
Niu et al 24 No, conference abstract
Novembre et al 56 No, Italian language
Pajno et al 57 Yes2114+
Pajno et al 58§Yes2114+
Rodriguez Santos et al 59 No, Spanish language
Rolinck-Werninghaus et al 60 Yes1203+
Yuksel et al 61 No, Spanish language
Penagos32 Bahceciler et al 54 Overlap with Calamita
Caffarelli et al 62 No, children with asthma not separately analysed
Hirsch et al 55 Overlap with Calamita
Ippoliti et al 63 Yes1102++
Niu et al 64 Yes1113++
Pajno et al 65 Yes2103+
Rolinck-Werninghaus et al 60 Overlap with Calamita
Tari et al 66 No, Spanish language
Vourdas et al 67 No, children with asthma not separately analysed
Pham-Thi44 Yes2114+++
Total80014
  • *1 point if randomisation is mentioned; 1 additional point if the method of randomisation is appropriate; −1 point if the method of randomization is inappropriate.

  • †1 point if blinding is mentioned; 1 additional point if the method of blinding is appropriate; −1 point if the method of blinding is inappropriate.

  • ‡1 point if the number and the reasons for withdrawal in each group are stated.

  • §Same patients as Pajno et al 57. 

  • FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; RCT, randomised controlled trial.