Table 2

Preferred mode and final mode of delivery of participating women (n=814) 

OutcomeIntent to have a second child (n=417)No Intent to have a second child (n=397)Crude RR (95%CI)Adjusted RR (95%CI)P value
Preference in second trimester
 Caesarean delivery26 (6.2%)71 (17.9%)0.31 (0.19 to 0.49)‡0.35 (0.20 to 0.63) 0.001
 Vaginal delivery or no preference (ref)*391 (93.8%)326 (82.1%)11
Preference at admission
 Caesarean delivery101 (24.2%)148 (37.3%)0.54 (0.40 to 0.73)‡0.65 (0.45 to 0.94) 0.02
 Vaginal delivery or no preference (ref)†316 (75.7%)249 (62.7%)11
Final mode of delivery
 overall cesarean delivery171 (41.0%)200 (50.4%)0.69 (0.52 to 0.90)‡0.84 (0.60 to 1.18)0.31
 Cesarean delivery on maternal request70 (16.7%)115 (29.0%)0.48 (0.33 to 0.71)‡0.56 (0.37 to 0.86) 0.008
 Antepartum cesarean delivery with borderline indications66 (15.8%)52 (13.1%)1 (0.64 to 1.55)1.14 (0.71 to 1.82)0.6
 Antepartum cesarean delivery with medical indications27 (6.5%)21 (5.3%)1.04 (0.54 to 2.02)1.33 (0.64 to 2.75)0.45
 Intrapartum cesarean delivery8 (1.9%)12 (3.0%)0.56 (0.21 to 1.51)0.73 (0.26 to 2.09)0.56
 Vaginal delivery (ref)246 (59%)197 (49.6%)11
  • Data expressed as n (%).

  • Adjusted for age, educational level, insurance, average income of the family, occupation, medical history, pregnancy complications, birth weight, maternal and neonatal morbidity.

  • ∗Seven women had no preference in the intent group and 13 women had no preference in no intent group.

  • †No women chose no preference in both groups.

  • ‡P<0.05.