Table 1

Findings from the feasibility study and corresponding modifications in the SMART-India study

ThemeFindingsModification
Sampling strategy
  • Recruiting an equal distribution of participants across the different age–sex stratum was difficult

  • Approaching households in a random fashion to recruit participants resulted in a bias towards selection of middle-aged female and older participants who were more likely to be present at home and available for screening

Use of census data to recruit an age-representative and sex-representative sample through stratified sampling to mitigate potential selection bias
Motion artefact
  • Participants found it difficult to maintain steady hands while placing their fingers on the AliveCor case without additional support

  • Participants found 2 min screening period to be too long to maintain steady hands

  • Use of clipboards to stabilise participants’ hands

  • Shorter recording time: 60 s (AliveCor) and 90 s (ANAND)

Screening protocol
  • A single time-point screening underestimated true AF prevalence (owing to paroxysmal AF)

  • Five screenings in a week were time consuming and led to participant attrition

Three screenings over the course of 5 days to account for paroxysmal events and prevent study attrition
Data management
  • Research staff had difficulties uploading ECG tracings for adjudication in a timely manner

  • Questionnaires in the field could not be entered using smartphones and tablets due to poor internet connectivity

  • Development of a web platform to assist with sharing of de-identified ECG recordings

  • Use of an off-line smartphone-based application

  • AF, atrial fibrillation; ANAND, Automated Novel Atrial fibrillation Noninvasive Detection; SMART-India, Smartphone Monitoring for Atrial fibrillation in Real-Time—India.