Name and description of intervention | Decisions of interest | Author and year | Country and healthcare setting | Literature type | Study design and methods | Study objective | |||
DNACPR | Ceilings of active care | Supportive/Palliative care | Communication guidelines around goals of care | ||||||
AMBER care bundle Care bundle consisting of a proforma and sticker Promotes consistent communication and care planning for patients identified as facing uncertain recovery | X | X | Carey et al, 201436 | UK Hospital (five acute wards) | Published peer-reviewed study | Descriptive/Quantitative: Overview of development and implementation of AMBER, and data on clinical impact | To describe the design, development and implementation of the AMBER care bundle and its impact on clinical service | ||
Etkind et al, 201460 | UK Hospital (five acute wards) | Published peer-reviewed study | Quantitative: Retrospective electronic case note review of patients who died in wards where AMBER was implemented | To evaluate application of the AMBER care bundle in a UK hospital and describe factors affecting its use | |||||
Morris et al, 201148 | UK Hospital | Published conference abstract | Descriptive: Overview of AMBER and its implementation | Learning points from implementation of the AMBER care bundle | |||||
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 201550 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | Policy document | Management of patients who are at end of life | |||||
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, 201255 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | Patient guidance | The AMBER care bundle, a guide for patients, their relatives and carers | |||||
Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) Form contextualising the CPR decision within overall treatment plans Includes documentation and discussion of care and treatment decisions | X | X | X | Fritz et al, 20133 | UK Hospital (two acute wards) | Published peer-reviewed study | Prospective mixed method: Case note review of DNACPR patients, qualitative interviews and observations | To determine whether the introduction of UFTO reduces harms in patients in whom a DNACPR was made, and to understand the mechanisms for observed change | |
Fritz et al, 201531 | UK Hospital (two acute wards) | Published peer-reviewed study | Expert consensus: Cross-disciplinary adapted Delphi method | To describe a cross-disciplinary approach to developing a universal form of treatment options as an alternative to DNACPR orders | |||||
www.ufto.org Accessed: 1 July 201578 | UK | Grey literature | Website | UFTO: universal form of treatment options | |||||
www.ufto.org/background/scientific-background Accessed 1 July 201543 | UK | Grey literature | Website | UFTO: scientific background | |||||
Goals of Patient Care Summary (GOPC) Form to summarise goals of care Serves as a guide for treatment decisions as the patient’s condition improves, stabilises or deteriorates | X | X | X | Brimblecombe et al, 201453 | Australia Hospital (adult medical inpatients) | Published peer-reviewed study | Quantitative: Cross-sectional review of medical inpatients and audit of inpatients requiring emergency medical review | To review the implementation of the GOPC: assess GOPC uptake, quantify completion and review outcomes of the GOPC assessment | |
Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form to ensure that patient wishes regarding life-sustaining treatments are honoured Converts treatment preferences into medical orders | X | X | X | Hickman et al, 200954 | USA Hospice (hospices in 3 US states) | Published peer-reviewed study | Descriptive/Quantitative: Survey of hospice staff members; case note review of deceased patients at subsample of POLST-using hospices | To evaluate use of POLST by hospice programmes, attitudes of hospice staff towards POLST, the effect of POLST on the use of life-sustaining treatments and the treatment options selected by patients | |
Gold Standards Framework for Care Homes (GSFCH) and an adapted Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) for Care Homes The implementation of two end-of-life care tools: the GSFCH supportive/palliative care register and an adapted LCP for Care Homes | X | X | X | Hockley et al, 201032 | UK Nursing home (seven nursing homes in Scotland) | Published peer-reviewed study | Quantitative/In-depth evaluation: Overview of implementation, retrospective case note review of deceased residents and staff audit | To evaluate the effectiveness of a high facilitation implementation on professional practices and residents outcomes | |
UIHC (University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics) Policy Regarding Do Not Resuscitate Orders and End of Life Discussions with Hospitalised Patients DNACPR order policy placing CPR discussions within a framework of end-of-life discussions, and within a larger goal-orientated context | X | X | X | Kaldjian and Broderick, 201151 | USA Hospital (academic medical centre) | Published peer-reviewed study | Descriptive: Overview of the integration of goals of care into staff education and revision of hospital DNACPR policy; literature review and survey of hospitalised adults | To describe the background and rationale for DNACPR policy revision and development; to describe the policy itself and ongoing implementation efforts | |
A revised DNACPR form, decision making tools and updated CPR guidelines | X | X | X | Mbriwa and Limaye, 201459 | UK Hospital (elderly and acute medical inpatients) | Published conference abstract | Quantitative: Prospective case note audit | To assess improvement in CPR decision-making and ceiling of care documentation/discussions since the introduction of a revised DNACPR form, decision-making tools and guidelines | |
ProvidersSignout for Scope ofTreatment (PSOST) A daily handover tool documenting resuscitation status, goals of care, desired and undesired interventions, in addition to standard handover information | X | X | X | Newport et al, 201037 | USA Palliative care (inpatient unit) | Published peer-reviewed study | Descriptive: Overview of tool development, implementation and utility | To describe the PSOST tool and evaluate its implementation and use in a palliative care unit | |
An intervention informing clinicians of the laws on Patients’ Rights and the importance of advanced care planning, alongside a new DNR (do not resuscitate) form Adapted DNACPR form, putting emphasis on the motivation, participants involved and communication of the decision-making process | X | X | Piers et al, 201438 | Belgium Hospital (adult inpatients) | Published peer-reviewed study | Quantitative: Prospective observational study of deceased inpatients preintervention and postintervention; cross-sectional study of patients admitted to non-intensive wards | To compare the quality of end-of-life care and DNACPR decisions between hospital wards and after a hospital-wide intervention to improve advanced care planning | ||
Treatment Escalation Plan and Resuscitation Decision (TEP-CPR) Treatment escalation plan tool, to be included in the resuscitation form | X | X | X | Stockdale et al, 201333 | UK Hospital (two acute wards) | Published peer-reviewed study | Quantitative/Descriptive: Case note audit and staff survey, followed by overview of TEP-CPR development; staff survey of out of hours treatment in patients with TEP-CPR and controls | To develop and test a tool for escalation planning; to identify whether a TEP-CPR could reduce the number of patients receiving inappropriate treatments out of hours | |
Ceiling ofTreatment (COT) Form Tool for improving decision-making and documentation of treatment escalation decisions | X | X | X | Dahill et al, 201334 | UK Hospital (elderly care wards) | Published peer-reviewed study | Quantitative/Descriptive: Overview of COT development and implementation; preimplementation and postimplementation case note review of treatment escalation decisions and staff feedback survey | To develop, pilot and implement a tool to improve decision-making and the documentation of treatment escalation decisions | |
Powter et al, 201239 | UK Hospital (elderly care wards) | Grey literature | Poster Quantitative/Descriptive: Overview of COT development and implementation; prepilot and postpilot data on decision documentation and staff survey | To improve decision-making and documentation of CPR and ceiling of treatment decisions | |||||
Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) (Devon) Form outlining what treatment options would be appropriate if a patient were to become acutely unwell | X | X | Obolensky et al, 20101 | UK Hospital (two acute trauma & orthopaedic wards) | Published peer-reviewed study | Prospective quantitative and qualitative evaluation: Patient/relative interviews to evaluate the TEP process | To evaluate patient and relative experiences of, and thoughts regarding the Devon TEP | ||
Mercer, 200961 | UK Hospital | Published letter | Letter to the editor Descriptive: Overview of TEP process | The death of DNR: TEPs | |||||
Obolensky and Mercer, 200766 | UK Hospital | Published conference abstract | Descriptive/Quantitative: overview of TEP process and staff survey | To evaluate initial impact of the Devon TEP from a clinical staff perspective | |||||
Obolensky and Mercer, 200756 | UK Hospital | Published conference abstract | Descriptive/Quantitative: overview of TEP process and patient survey | To evaluate patient experiences of the Devon TEP | |||||
Karakusevic44 | UK Hospital (acute hospital) | Grey literature | Poster Descriptive: Overview of background to development and TEP implementation | To evaluate implementation of the Devon TEP | |||||
Torbay and Southern Devon Health and Care NHS Trust, 201452 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | Policy document | TEP and resuscitation decision records policy | |||||
Care Quality Commission (CQC), 201446 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | CQC report | Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, end-of-life care quality report | |||||
Rowcroft Hospice, 201357 | UK Hospice | Grey literature | Patient guidance | TEP forms, public information document | |||||
Devon Local Medical Committee, 201379 | UK | Grey literature | Staff guidance | TEP—newsletter update article | |||||
Macmillan Cancer Support, St Luke’s Hospice Plymouth & North, East and West Devon Clinical Commissioning Group80 | UK Hospice | Grey literature | Staff guidance | New TEP form (V.10)—frequently asked questions document | |||||
North Devon Healthcare NHS Trust81 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | Staff guidance | Staff briefing note on the use of TEPs | |||||
NHS Improving Quality Team, 201482 | UK | Grey literature | Staff guidance | Guidance for completing TEP and resuscitation decisions | |||||
Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) Tool for planning the care of a patient at risk of deterioration | X | X | X | Paes and O’Neill, 201262 | UK Hospital (six acute specialties) | Published conference abstract | Descriptive/Quantitative: Pilot, audit and staff feedback survey | To evaluate staff feedback and decision-making outcomes before and after TEP introduction | |
Paes, 201263 | UK Hospital (six acute wards and community hospital) | Grey literature | Poster Descriptive/Quantitative: Overview of TEP implementation and next steps; case note review audit before and after TEP pilot, and staff survey | To pilot TEP and evaluate staff feedback, out of hours decision-making/discussions and TEP completion outcomes; to determine whether and how TEP should be introduced across the trust | |||||
HDU (high dependency unit) Specific Treatment Escalation Plan Plan for ceiling of treatment and escalation level decision on every patient within 24 hours | X | X | Hannah, 201440 | UK Hospital (medical HDU) | Grey literature | Poster Descriptive: Overview of TEP development, implementation and next steps, including informal staff feedback | To describe and evaluate the process of TEP development and its implementation in a medical high dependency unit | ||
Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) Proforma | X | X | X | Thomson et al, 201464 | UK Hospital (acute medicine) | Grey literature | Poster Quantitative: Case note review audit before and after TEP pilot, and staff survey | To pilot TEP and evaluate staff feedback and DNACPR/TEP documentation outcomes | |
Cornwall Treatment Escalation Plan and Resuscitation Decision Record | X | X | Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, 201549 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | Policy document | TEP and resuscitation decision record policy | ||
Escalation plan and resuscitation status (EPARS) Form amalgamating escalation plan and CPR decisions | X | X | X | West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, 201345 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | Policy document | Trust policy and procedure: EPARS (including DNACPR) | |
TreatmentEscalation Plan (TEP) | X | X | Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 201458 | UK NHS Trust | Grey literature | Patient guidance | TEP patient information | ||
Content guidelines for discussions of CPR and life-sustaining therapy Guidelines for the content of a discussion about resuscitation or goals of care | X | X | X | Downar and Hawryluck, 201041 | Canada Hospital (12 physicians) | Published peer-reviewed study | Expert Consensus: Delphi method to develop content guidelines | To develop content guidelines for discussions of CPR and life-sustaining therapy | |
A palliative care treatment plan intervention Best practice guidance supported by a staff education programme, electronic decision support tool and paper educational tools | X | Bailey et al, 201447 | USA Hospital (inpatient units at six veteran medical centres) | Published peer-reviewed study | Descriptive/Quantitative: Overview of intervention and its multicentre implementation; preimplementation and postimplementation case note review of end of life care in deceased patients | To evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention strategy to improve the processes and quality of end-of-life care in acute inpatient settings | |||
The Palliative Care forAdvanced Disease (PCAD) pathway To improve palliative care for inpatients who are expected to die from advanced disease; clinical pathway including: –interdisciplinary care pathway –nurses documentation flowsheet –physicians order sheet with guidelines for symptom management | X | Bookbinder et al, 200542 | USA Hospital (3 inpatient units) | Published peer-reviewed study | Descriptive/Quantitative: Overview of intervention, its development and implementation; case note review of care outcomes in patients who died before and during implementation, in both intervention and control units | To describe the development and quality improvement strategy for the implementation of PCAD; to pilot and evaluate the utility of PCAD | |||
Serious illness conversation guide Guide describing key elements to be addressed in patient conversations about serious illness care goals | X | X | Bernacki and Block, 201465 | USA | Published peer-reviewed study | Literature review and synthesis of best practices in conversations about serious illness care goals | To provide clinicians with practical, evidence-based advice (in the form of a serious illness conversation guide) | ||
The VOICE (Values Options in Cancer Care) intervention Education and coaching communication intervention To facilitate communication and decision-making among oncologists, patients and caregivers | X | Hoerger et al, 201335 | USA Oncology services | Published peer-reviewed study | Descriptive: Overview of intervention and its planned implementation as part of an RCT | To describe the study design and rationale for a patient-centred communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers |
CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNACPR, do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation; TEP, treatment escalation plan; NHS, National Health Service; RCT, randomised controlled trial.