Table 1

Principal results comparing use of an antimicrobial resistance point-of-care test (AMR POCT) for ciprofloxacin (scenario 3a) or penicillin resistance (scenario 3b) against current testing practice (standard laboratory testing, no POCT) for the management of gonorrhoea (scenario 1), assuming the current attendance at genitourinary medicine clinic annually

Heterosexual maleMSMFemaleOverall
Considering use of POCT test for ciprofloxacin resistance
Annual ceftriaxone treatments
 Current (scenario 1)769017 691805033 431
 AMR POCT (scenario 3a)21887933125711 378
 Reduction under scenario 3a55029759679322 054
 Percentage reduction in ceftriaxone72558466
Proportion treated same day (%)
 Current (scenario 1) 68632154
 AMR POCT (scenario 3a) 100100100100
 Increase under scenario 3a 32377946
Mean time to treatment (days)
 Current (scenario 1)1.51.83.92.2
 AMR POCT (scenario 3a)0.00.00.00.0
 Reduction under scenario 3a1.51.83.92.2
Persons lost to follow-up (untreated)
 Current (scenario 1)125338329792
 AMR POCT (scenario 3a)0000
Considering use of POCT test for penicillin resistance
Annual ceftriaxone treatments*
 Current (scenario 1)769017 691805033 431
 AMR POCT (scenario 3b)140746888386932
 Reduction under scenario 3b628313 004721226 499
 Percentage reduction in ceftriaxone82749079
  • *All other outcomes same as for use of POCT for ciprofloxacin resistance. Results for strategy 2 not shown: equivalent to strategy 3 except for choice of antibiotic treatment. Results for 3b also equivalent to 3a for outcomes except reduction in ceftriaxone treatments.

  • MSM, men who have sex with men.