Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participants of the PACT study included in the cost-effectiveness analyses*

Breast cancerColon cancer
Intervention (N=87)Control (N=78)Intervention (N=14)Control (N=15)
Age (years)50.0±7.949.4±7.657.4±11.259.1±8.9
Educational status
 Low2 (2%)12 (15%)1 (7%)2 (13%)
 Medium40 (46%)33 (42%)6 (43%)4 (27%)
 High43 (49%)33 (42%)7 (50%)9 (60%)
 Missing2 (2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Marital status
 Alone17 (20%)14 (18%)4 (29%)5 (33%)
 Married/living together70 (81%)64 (82%)10 (71%)10 (67%)
Gender
 Male0 (0%)0 (0%)7 (50%)11 (73%)
 Female87 (100%)78 (100%)7 (50%)4 (27%)
Tissue expander
 Yes9 (10%)8 (10%)
 No78 (90%)70 (90%)
Radiotherapy
 Yes60 (69%)52 (67%)1 (7%)1 (7%)
 No27 (31%)26 (33%)13 (93%)14 (93%)
Chemotherapy
 FEC/DOC54 (62%)53 (68%)
 AC/paclitaxel trastuzumab16 (18%)10 (13%)
 TAC17 (20%)15 (19%)
 CAPOX13 (93%)15 (100%)
 Capecitabine mono1 (7%)0 (0%)
Tumour receptor status
 Triple-20 (23%)8 (10%)
 Her2Neu+&ER or PR+10 (12%)11 (14%)
 Her2Neu+&ER and PR−10 (12%)2 (3%)
 Her2Neu−&ER or PR+47 (54%)57 (73%)
Menopausal status
 Postmenopausal39 (45%)23 (30%)3 (21%)3 (20%)
 Premenopausal40 (46%)53 (68%)3 (21%)0 (0%)
 Not applicable (male)7 (50%)11 (73%)
 Missing8 (9%)2 (3%)1 (7%)1 (7%)
Body mass index (kg/m2)25.3±4.225.8±4.526.8±4.426.0±2.9
  • *Continuous values are given as mean±SD and categorical values in number of patients (%).

  • DOC, Docetaxel; AC, Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide; FEC, 5-fluorouracil, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide; TAC, Docetaxel, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide.