TableĀ 3

PRISMA for Abstracts item-by-item ratings

ReferenceItem 1Item 2Item 3aItem 3bItem 4aItem 4bItem 5Item 6Item 7Item 8Item 9Item 10Item 11Item 12Total yes
Pocklington, 201634YesNoNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoYesYesNoNo5 (36%)
Bosanquet, 201531YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoYesYesNoYes5 (36%)
Moriarty, 201533YesNoYesNoYesNoNoYesYesNoYesYesNoNo7 (50%)
Stockings, 201535YesNoNoNoYesNoNoNoYesNoYesYesNoNo5 (36%)
Manea, 201532YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNo2 (14%)
Meader, 201429YesNoNoNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNo4 (29%)
Tsai, 201425YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNo2 (14%)
Tsai, 201326YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNo3 (21%)
Mitchell, 201230YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesYesYesNoNo4 (29%)
Manea, 201218YesNoNoNoYesYesNoYesYesNoNoYesNoNo6 (43%)
Meader, 201117YesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoNoNoYesYesNoNo5 (36%)
Vodermaier, 201127YesNoNoNoYesNoNoNoYesNoNoNoNoNo3 (21%)
Brennan, 201016YesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNo5 (36%)
Mitchell, 2010a22YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNo3 (21%)
Mitchell, 2010b24YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNo2 (14%)
Mitchell, 2010c21YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNo3 (21%)
Hewitt, 200928NoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoYesNoNoYesNoNo4 (29%)
Mitchell, 200820YesNoNoNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNo4 (29%)
Gilbody, 200715YesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesYesYesYesNoNo7 (50%)
Mitchell, 200723YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesYesNoYesNoNo4 (29%)
Wittkampf, 200719YesNoNoNoYesYesYesNoYesNoNoYesNoNo6 (43%)
Total yes20 (95%)0 (0%)1 (5%)0 (0%)9 (43%)7 (33%)3 (14%)2 (10%)16 (76%)3 (14%)7 (33%)20 (95%)0 (0%)1 (5%)
  • Item 1, title; Item 2, objectives; Item 3a, eligibility criteria study characteristics; Item 3b, eligibility criteria report characteristics; Item 4a, databases searched; Item 4b, search dates; Item 5, risk of bias; Item 6, included studies; Item 7, synthesis of results; Item 8, description of outcomes; Item 9, strengths and limitations of evidence; Item 10, interpretation; Item 11, funding; Item 12, registration.

  • PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.