Table 1

Methodological quality of included studies

StudyStudy designRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsGrade
Kessler and Käfer24Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Aranda Villalobos et al31Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNoneLow
Nankaku et al26Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Slaven28Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNoneLow
Moran et al25Observational studyNANot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Stevens et al30Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Wang et al32Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNoneModerate
Dowsey et al20Observational studySeriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationLow
Judge et al33Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousVery strong associationHigh
Bergschmidt et al17Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Jones et al22Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Smith et al29Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousSeriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Judge et al23Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousVery strong associationHigh
Bischoff et al18Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Gandhi et al21Observational studySeriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNoneLow
Nilsdotter et al27Observational studyNot seriousSeriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationLow
Davis et al19Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousVery strong associationHigh
Hamilton et al35Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNoneLow
Quintana et al37Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Nilsdotter and Lohmander36Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Dowsey et al34Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousVery strong associationHigh
Lavernia, 201138Observational studySeriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationLow
Mahomed et al39Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Vogl et al43Observational studyNot seriousSeriousNot seriousNot seriousNALow
Clement et al42Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousVery strong associationHigh
Johansson et al40Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Fortin et al41Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousSeriousStrong associationLow
Badura-Brzoza et al44Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Holstege et al46Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Schafer et al47Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNAStrong associationLow
Graves et al48Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
Lavernia, 201449Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNANoneLow
Lavernia et al45Observational studyNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousStrong associationModerate
  • High: true effect lies close to the estimate of the effect.

  • Moderate: true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.

  • Low: true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

  • Very low: true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

  • GRADE, Grading Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation; NA, not applicable.