Investigators' opinions of Consent for Contact (C4C) in relation to their studies
| Total (n=19) | 10+ participants recruited (n=6) | Between 1 and 9 participants recruited (n=7) | 0 participants recruited (n=6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C4C was valuable | 5.5 (SD=2.9) | 7.0 (SD=3.5) | 5.9 (SD=2.1) | 3.7 (SD=2.4) |
| C4C was useful | 6.1 (SD=2.8) | 7.8 (SD=1.5) | 6.7 (SD=2.2) | 3.5 (SD=2.7) |
| C4C was easy to use | 7.1 (SD=1.5) | 7.2 (SD=.8) | 6.7 (SD=1.9) | 7.5 (SD=1.5) |
| Likely to use C4C again | 8.5 (SD=1.7) | 9.7 (SD=.5) | 8.4 (SD=2.1) | 7.5 (SD=1.5) |