Table 1

Key characteristics of gastrointestinal surgery studies (n=29)

First author's nameYearCountryPrimary or Secondary aimSample (N=number of patients in analysis/eligible patients, Nt(i)=sample size per time point, Nc=patients with complications, N1=cases vs N2=controls)Patient inclusion criteriaStudy designType of surgerySurgical complications/method of recordingPsychosocial outcome/time points/measurement toolSignificant association of surgical complications with patients’ well-being (yes/no/confounding)Types of complications and time points of significant effectsQuality assessment score (out of 8)
Anthony2003USSecondaryNt1=71/?
Nt2=63
Nc=16
Colorectal cancer, male patients who underwent open surgical therapyObservational, cohort, prospectiveOpen surgical therapy for colorectal cancerMorbidity was defined as any event that resulted in the need for additional therapy or readmission to the hospital within 30 days of initial discharge/method not specifiedQoL/at time of diagnosis and 12 months after surgery/FACT-CYes*Any complications/12 months postsurgery6
Avery2006UKPrimaryN=139/162
Nc=37
Patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer who underwent upper gastrointestinal surgical treatmentObservational, cross-sectionalUpper gastrointestinal surgical treatment for oesophageal or gastric cancerA major complication was defined as reoperation, readmission to the high dependency or intensive care unit, readmission to the hospital within 30 days of operation, or death within 30 days of operation or later if the patient did not leave the hospital/method not specifiedQOL/39.6 days after treatment (range 6–105)/EORTC QLQ-C30YesAny complications/39.6 days after treatment (range 6–105)5
Bitzer2008GermanySecondaryNt1=151/205
Nt2=130 (86.1%)
Nc(complaints)=49
Nc(wound infection)=5
Nc(seroma)=13
Nc(pneumonia)=1
Nc(other)=28
Patients undergoing cholecystectomyObservational, cohort, prospectiveCholecystectomyRetrospective list: any complaint, wound infection, seroma, pneumonia, other complaints/patient reportsQoL/14 days preoperative, 14 days postoperative, and 6 months postoperative/SF-36Yes*Any complications/6 months postsurgery7
Bloemen2009The NetherlandsPrimaryN=121/170
Nc=33
Patients with rectal cancerObservational, cross-sectionalSurgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of the rectumOnly severe complications were considered: grade III or IV complications (according to Dindo's model) were defined as severe, whereas absence of complications or grade I and II complications were defined as absent or mild complications/patient recordsQoL/36 (16–51) months postoperative/EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR38YesSevere postoperative complications/median of 36 (range 16–51) months postsurgery6
Bruns2010GermanySecondaryN=96/188
Nc(any morbidity)=30
Nc(wound infections)=10
Patients who underwent curative hepatic resection for malignant or non-malignant diseases, disease free at time of assessmentObservational, cross-sectionalHepatectomySurgical (eg, bile leak or biloma, pneumothorax, wound infection, liver abscess, bleeding, and surgical dehiscence) and medical (eg, pleural effusion, renal failure, hepatic failure, pneumonia, cardiac insufficiency and cholangitis)/patient recordsQoL/ 3–36 months postoperative /SF-12YesWound infections/3–36 months postsurgery5
Champault2006FranceSecondaryNt1=152/?
Nt(4)=139
Nc=(unclear)
Consecutive patients operated on for morbid obesityObservational, cohort, prospectiveLaparoscopic placement of a gastric bandRetrospective list: pulmonary atelectasis or pneumonia, prolonged ileus, minor wounds problems and urinary retention. Slippage with a peak incidence during the second postoperative year. Band erosion with penetration into the stomach. Access port problems (infection, haematoma, leak, disconnection), bands explanted, associated with erosion, obstruction, immediate intolerance and recurrent tubing break/method not specifiedQoL/preoperative, 1, 3 months and 2 years postoperative/GIQLIConfounding*Band removal for complications such as erosion, slippage, intolerance/2-year postsurgery6
Chang2010TaiwanSecondaryN=102/218
Nc(anastomotic stricture)=12
Nc(gastrojejunal anastomotic ulcer)=9
Nc(upper gastrointestinal bleeding)=1
N(GORD)=2
Patients undergoing bariatric surgery.Observational, case–control, longitudinalRoux-en-Y bypassOperation-related complications, including gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture, gastrojejunal anastomotic ulcer, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD)/method not specifiedQoL/preoperative, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative/WHOQoL-BREFYes*Any complications/1, 3, 6, 12 months postsurgery5
Dasgupta2008UKSecondaryNt1=102/122
Nt2=87
Nt3=80
Nt4=33
Nc=44
Consecutive, patients undergoing liver surgery for liver cancerObservational, prospective, cohortLiver resection for hepatic malignanciesMajor complications were defined as those associated with systemic illness requiring transfer to a higher level of care (high dependency or intensive care unit) or requiring relaparotomy, or complications needing interventional radiology/method not specifiedQoL/preoperative, 6, 12, 36–48 months postoperative/EORTC QLQ-C30No*NA6
Delaney2003USASecondaryNt1=109/109
Nt2=82/109
Nc(any)=19
Nc(major)=9
Patients with Crohn's diseaseObservational, cohort, prospectiveSurgery for CD (abdominal perineal, loop or end stoma)Retrospectively listed complications: anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess, bleeding, venous thrombosis, renal failure, and pneumonia, dehydration, intra-abdominal abscess, small bowel obstruction and wound infection/database reviewQoL/preoperative and 30 days postoperative/CGQLYes*Any complications/30 days postoperative7
Douma2011The NetherlandsSecondaryN=296/?
Nc=?
296 patients with FAP who had been surgically treatedObservational, cross-sectionalSurgery for FAPSurgery-related complications/self-reports+medical recordsQoL/0 to >10 years postoperative/SF-36, EORTC-QLQ-C38,Social Functioning subscale of the Dutch version of IBDQYesAny complications/0 to >10 years postsurgery2
Dubernard2006FranceSecondaryNt1=58/?
Nt2=58
Nc=9
Women with colorectal endometriosis who underwent a segmental colorectal resectionObservational, cohort, prospective Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosisRetrospectively listed complications: rectovaginal fistulae, vessel injury of the protective colostomy treated by laparoscopic coagulation, uroperitoneum requiring a ureteral stent for 6 weeks and an abscess behind colorectal anastomosis requiring a laparoscopic drainage/patient observationsQoL/preoperative and postoperative/SF-36No*NA6
El-Awady2009EgyptSecondaryN=40/?
Nc=14
Patients with inguinal herniaObservational, prospective, cohortAnterior open Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplastyPostoperative complications: seroma, haematoma, secondary infection, neuralgia and anaesthesia/patient observationsQoL/preoperative, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative/SF-36NoNA4
Hawn2006USAPrimaryNt1=1983/3518
Nt2=1526 (77%)
Nt3=1603 (81%)
Nc(neuralgia t1)=94
Nc(haematoma t1)=51
Nc(orchitis t1)=13
Nc(recurrence t1)=76
Nc(other t1)=124
Nc(neuralgia t2)=105
Nc(haematoma t2)=55
Nc(orchitis t2)=18
Nc(other t2)=150
Men who received a hernia repairObservational, cohort, prospectiveInguinal herniorrhaphyComplications were summarised by 4 categories: (1) haematoma/seroma, (2) orchitis, (3) neuralgia of the leg or groin, and (4) other. complications classified as ‘other’ included (1) early postoperative complications (urinary tract infection, urinary retention, and haematuria); (2) life-threatening complications (respiratory insufficiency, myocardial ischaemia, cardiac arrhythmia, intraoperative hypotension and stroke); and (3) long-term complications (4 weeks or more postoperative)/patient reports for neuralgia and orchitis + expert consensus for life-threatening complicationsQOL/pre-op, 1 &2 years post-op/SF-36Yes*Neuralgia, orchitis/2 years postsurgery8
Ince2011USASecondaryNt1=?/568
Nt2=166
Nc=?
Patients who underwent colorectal resection for benign and malignant diseases.Observational, cohort, retrospectiveLaparoscopic colorectal resectionNo referenceQOL/pre-op, 4 weeks post-op/SF-36No*NA3
Kalliomaki2009SwedenPrimaryN(total)=184/423
N1=92 (cases)
N2=92 (controls)
Patients who had been operated on for groin hernia. Controls matched for age, gender and method of surgical repair were allotted from the group of persons without persisting pain (grade 1 in IPQ)Observational, case–control, cross-sectionalHernia repairPersistent postoperative pain (patients with pain of grade 3, ie, pain that could not be ignored but did not interfere with everyday activities, or higher on IPQ)/patient reports (IPQ) and clinical examinationQoL, anxiety, depression/(on average 4.9 years postoperative, range > 7 years)/SF-36, HADSYesPersistent postoperative/mean of 4.9 years postsurgery5
Kement2011TurkeyPrimaryN=253/351
N(incontinence)=28
N(severe incontinence)=9
N(mild incontinence)=19
Consecutive patients with chronic anal fissure who underwent open lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS).Observational, cross-sectionalOpen lateral internal sphincterotomyAnal incontinence/patient reports: WIS system + clinical examinationQoL/23.3±7.1 months postoperative/SF-36YesSevere incontinence/23.3 (SD±7.1) months postsurgery5
Lim2006UKPrimaryN=92/112
Nc(leaks)=23
Nc(clinical leaks)=13
Nc(subclinical leaks)=10
Consecutive patients under the care of three consultant surgeons who underwent procedures with LRAObservational, cross-sectionalLRAAnastomotic leaks (clinical and subclinical)/patient observations, CT scans, Wireless Capsule Endoscopy (WCE)QoL/10–18 months postoperative/EORTC QoLConfoundingAnastomotic leaks/10–18 months postoperative5
Liu2010USPrimaryN=679/1308
Nc(early comps/anastomosis)=54
Nc(late comps/anastomosis)=126
Nc(early comps/anastomosis/rectal cancer only)=42
Nc(late comps/ostomy/rectal cancer only)=105
Patients with long-term colorectal cancerObservational, cross-sectionalColorectal cancer surgeryDigestive, skin, genitourinary, surgical, medical, immediate indirect complicationsEarly complications: those that were first recorded within 30 days of the surgery. Late complications: occurring 31 days after surgery/patient computerised dataQoL/ 5–15 years postoperative/modified City of Hope (mCOH)-QoL-OstomyYesEnterocutaneous fistula for all patients and any late complications for ostomy patients >5 years postsurgery6
Mentes2006TurkeyPrimaryNt1=253/302
Nt2=244
Nc(anal fistula/abscess)=3
Nc(Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)>0)=7
Nc(FISI, 0 to >4, 21, 7)=3
Patients who underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) for CAFObservational, cohort, prospectiveLateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) for CAFAnal incontinence/atient examination+ FISI scoreQoL/preoperative (admission) and 12 months postoperative/GIQLI and FIQLUnclear (due to small number of patients with complications)NA6
Pittman2008USAPrimaryN=239/322
Nc=56
Veterans with an ostomy after major gastrointestinal surgery requiring an intestinal stomaObservational, case–control, cross-sectionalGastrointestinal surgery requiring an intestinal stomaOstomy complications: skin problems, leakage and difficulty with adjustment (ie, leakage, peristomal irritant dermitis, pain, bleeding, stomal necrosis, prolapse, stenosis, herniation, retraction, infection, mucotaneous separation, difficulty adjusting)/patient reportsQoL/6 months postoperative/mCOH-QoL-OstomyYesOstomy complications (skin problems, leakage)/ 6 months postsurgery6
Polese2012ItalyPrimaryN=147/211
Nc(anastomotic stenoses)=22
Patients who underwent elective left colonic or rectal resection and colorectal anastomosis for neoplastic or inflammatory diseaseObservational, cross-sectionalLeft colonic or rectal resection and colorectal anastomosisAnastomotic stenosis/clinical examinationQoL/mean 58 (SD±31) months postoperative/SF-36YesAnastomotic stenosis/58 (SD±31) months postsurgery6
Rea2007USAPrimaryNt1=505/?
Nt2=237
Nt3=106
Nc(t2)=41
Nc(t3)=23
Patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) by one surgeon for morbid obesityObservational, cohort, prospectiveLRYGB for morbid obesity without conversion to an open procedurePostoperative complications requiring intervention/method not specifiedQoL/baseline, 1 and 2 years postoperative/SF-36Yes*Complications requiring intervention/1 and 2 years postsurgery6
Riss2011AustriaPrimaryN1=16/36 (cases)
N2=16/? (controls)
Cases: patients operated for rectal cancer and developed anastomotic leak. Controls: patients operated for rectal cancer at the same time period and had an uneventful postoperative course matched by sex, age (±5 years), type of resection, and neoadjuvant therapyObservational, case–control, cross-sectionalRectal resection for malignancies on overall pelvic organ functionAnastomotic leakage: defined as grade A (no change in patient's management), grade B (requires active therapeutic intervention but is managed without relaparotomy) and grade C (requires relaparotomy)/review of the institutional colorectal database and individual chart reviewsQoL/106.8 months postoperative (32.4–170.4)/SF-12NoNA7
Rutegard2008SwedenSecondaryN=355/446 (79·6%)
Nc=56
Patients diagnosed with an
oesophageal or cardia cancer who underwent macroscopically
and microscopically radical resection
Observational, cross-sectionalOesophageal resectionTechnical surgical complications, including postoperative bleed exceeding 2000 ml or requiring a reoperation, anastomotic insufficiency, necrosis of the substitute, damage to the recurrent nerve, thoracic duct damage or gastric perforation/prospective scrutiny of medical and histopathological records, operation charts, extensive study protocol with predefined exposure alternativesQoL/6 months postoperative/EORT QLQ-C30, and QLQ-OES1812YesTechnical complications/6 months postsurgery7
Scarpa2009ItalySecondaryN=47/?
Nc=?
Patients admitted for intestinal surgery for Crohn's diseaseObservational, cross-sectionalBowel resection through midline laparotomy or with laparoscopic assistance, end ileostomy, stricturoplastyMedical and surgical complications and need of reoperation (2 anastomotic leaks, 3 intestinal obstructions, 2 intestinal bleeding, and a wound infection were recorded and two relaparotomies)/method not specifiedQoL/3 months postoperative/CGQLIConfoundingAny complications/3 months postsurgery3
Sharma2007UKSecondaryNt1=104/110
Nt2=92
Nc=41
Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed colorectal
cancer scheduled for elective open resection in one hospital trust
Observational, cohort, prospectiveElective resection
for colorectal cancer
Wound, urinary tract and chest infections, cardiac and respiratory complications, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and complications related to anastomotic breakdown/method not specifiedQoL, anxiety, depression, positive vs negative affectivity, mood states/preoperative (5–12 days preoperative) and 6–8 weeks postoperative/FACT-C, EuroQOL (EQ-5D), HADS, PANAS, MRSYes*Complications within 30 days of operation/6–8 weeks postsurgery6
Siassi2009GermanySecondaryNt1=93/113
Nt2,t3=79
Nc=26
Patients undergoing colorectal surgery for benign and malignant
disease
Observational, prospective, cohortResection of the sigmoid
colon or rectum
Postoperative complications (anastomotic leak, wound infection, delayed food intake, fever, and bladder dysfunction)/method not specifiedQoL/preoperative, 3 and 12 months postoperative/SF-36 and GLQIYes*Any complications/3 months postsurgery7
Targarona2004SpainPrimaryN=37/46
Nc(recurrent hernias)=3
Patients diagnosed with paraoesophageal or mixed hiatal hernia (types II, III and IV) with >50% of the stomach in the chestObservational, cross-sectionalLaparoscopic repair of paraoesophageal hiatal herniaHernia recurrence (any migration of the cardia to chest level or evidence of a new paraoesophageal sac)/a barium swallow was given to all patients to rule out an anatomic recurrence. An independent radiologist evaluated all the explorationsQoL/≥6 months postoperative (median, 24; range, 6–50)/SF-36, GDSS and GIQLIYesClinically recurrent hernias/≥6 months postsurgery5
Viklund2005SwedenSecondaryN=100/146
Nc=44
Patients newly diagnosed with a histologically verified adenocarcinoma or squamous-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia that underwent macroscopically and microscopically radical tumour resectionObservational, cross-sectionalOesophageal resection surgery for cancerAnastomotic leakage, infections, respiratory insufficiency, cardiac complications, technical complications, anastomotic strictures, and others (intervention needed to treat embolus, deep venous thrombosis, rupture of the wound, intestinal obstruction, stroke, renal failure, or liver failure)/patient recordsQoL/6 months postdischarge/QLQ-C30 and OES-24YesAny complications, anastomotic leakage, infection, respiratory insufficiency, cardiac complications, technical complications/6 months postdischarge7
  • Symptoms specific to oesophageal cancer.

  • *Study controlled for patients’ preoperative well-being.

  • CAF, chronic anal fissure; CGQL, Cleveland Global Quality of Life; COH-QoL Ostomy, City of Hope Quality of Life for Ostomates questionnaire; EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core; EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of colorectal cancer; FACT-C, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy questionnaire with the colorectal module; FAP, familial adenomatous polyposis; FIQL, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument; GDSS, Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score; GIQLI, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index; GLQI, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IBDQ, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; IPQ, Inguinal Pain Questionnaire; LRA, low rectal anastomosis; MRS, Mood Rating Scale; NA, not available; OES, Oesophageal Cancer-Specific questionnaire; PANAS, positive and negative affect schedule; SF, Short Form Health Survey; WHOQoL BREF, WHO Quality of Life—Brief; WIS, Wexner Incontinence Score.