Table 4

The prevalence of MetS and the individual components of dyslipidemia between the APOE2 and APOE4 groups

APOE2APOE4OR (95% CI)p Value
n130136
MetS (no/yes)86/44 (33.8%)81/55 (40.4%)1.327 (0.806 to 2.186)0.266
Abdominal obesity (no/yes)*46/84 (64.6%)32/104 (76.5%)1.78 (1.042 to 3.039)0.034
Hypertension (no/yes)*67/63 (48.5%)49/87 (64.0%)1.888 (1.156 to 3.085)0.011
Hypertriglyceridaemia (no/yes)61/69 (53.1%)52/84 (61.8%)1.428 (0.877 to 2.327)0.152
Hypercholesterolaemia (no/yes)*120/10 (7.7%)112/24 (17.6%)2.571 (1.177 to 5.617)0.015
Hyperglycaemia (no/yes)114/16 (12.3%)125/11 (8.1%)0.627 (0.299 to 1.407)0.255
Low HDL-C (no/yes)103/27 (13.6%)115/21 (10.6%)0.697 (0.371 to 1.307)0.259
  • Pearson’s χ2 test was used to analyse the differences.

  • Power by YOZOSOFT.

  • *The mean difference was significant at the 0.05 level.

  • HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MetS, metabolic syndrome.