RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of birth weight between school health records and medical birth records in Denmark: determinants of discrepancies
JF BMJ Open
JO BMJ Open
FD British Medical Journal Publishing Group
SP e008628
DO 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008628
VO 5
IS 11
A1 Camilla Bjørn Jensen
A1 Michael Gamborg
A1 Berit Heitmann
A1 Thorkild I A Sørensen
A1 Jennifer L Baker
YR 2015
UL http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/11/e008628.abstract
AB Objective To compare reported birth weight (BW) information in school health records with BW from medical birth records, and to investigate if maternal and offspring characteristics were associated with any discrepancies.Design Register-based cohort study.Setting Denmark, 1973–1991.Participants The study was based on BW recorded in the Copenhagen School Health Records Register (CSHRR) and in The Medical Birth Register (MBR). The registers were linked via the Danish personal identification number.Primary and secondary outcome measures Statistical comparisons of BW in the registers were performed using t tests, Pearson's correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and κ coefficients. Odds of BW discrepancies >100 g were examined by logistic regressions.Results The study population included 47 534 children. From 1973 to 1979 when BW was grouped in 500 g intervals in the MBR, mean BW differed significantly between the registers. During 1979–1991 when BW was recorded in 10 and 1 g intervals, mean BW did not significantly differ between the two registers. BW from both registers was highly correlated (0.93–0.97). Odds of a BW discrepancy significantly increased with parity, the child's age at recall and by marital status (children of married women had the highest odds).Conclusions Overall, BW information in school health records agreed very well with BW from medical birth records, suggesting that reports of BWs in school health records in Copenhagen, Denmark generally are valid.