RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study
JF BMJ Open
JO BMJ Open
FD British Medical Journal Publishing Group
SP e001788
DO 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001788
VO 3
IS 4
A1 Annegret Hella Dahlmann-Noor
A1 Renata Puertas
A1 Shenille Tabasa-Lim
A1 Ahmed El-Karmouty
A1 Mustafa Kadhim
A1 Nicholas Kloster Wride
A1 Amanda Lewis
A1 Dawn Grosvenor
A1 Poornima Rai
A1 Maria Papadopoulos
A1 John Brookes
A1 Catey Bunce
A1 Peng Tee Khaw
YR 2013
UL http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/4/e001788.abstract
AB Objective To test agreement of two methods to measure intraocular pressure (IOP): rebound tonometry (RBT) and gold standard Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in children with glaucoma. Design Observational prospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary paediatric glaucoma clinic at a single centre. Participants 102 individuals attending a paediatric glaucoma clinic, mean (SD) age 11.85 (3.17), of whom 53 were male. Primary and secondary outcome measures Intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, child preference for measurement method. Results Limits of agreement for intraobserver and interobserver were, respectively, (−2.71, 2.98) mm Hg and (−5.75, 5.97) mm Hg. RBT frequently gave higher readings than GAT and the magnitude of disagreement depend on the level of IOP being assessed. Differences of 10 mm Hg were not uncommon. RBT was the preferred method for 70% of children. Conclusions There is poor agreement between RBT and GAT in children with glaucoma. RBT frequently and significantly overestimates IOP. However, ‘normal’ RBT readings are likely to be accurate and may spare children an examination under anaesthesia (EUA). High RBT readings should prompt the practitioner to use another standard method of IOP measurement if possible, or consider the RBT measurement in the context of clinical findings before referring the child to a specialist clinic or considering EUA.