PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - McGowan, Catherine R AU - Gokulakrishnan, Dhikshitha AU - Monaghan, Emily AU - Abdelmagid, Nada AU - Romig, Laura AU - Gallagher, Meghan C AU - Meyers, Janet AU - Cummings, Rachael AU - Cardinal, Laura J TI - Measuring supply-side service disruption: a systematic review of the methods for measuring disruption in the context of maternal and newborn health services in low and middle-income settings AID - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077583 DP - 2023 Dec 01 TA - BMJ Open PG - e077583 VI - 13 IP - 12 4099 - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/12/e077583.short 4100 - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/12/e077583.full SO - BMJ Open2023 Dec 01; 13 AB - Objectives During the COVID-19 pandemic, most essential services experienced some level of disruption. Disruption in LMICs was more severe than in HICs. Early reports suggested that services for maternal and newborn health were disproportionately affected, raising concerns about health equity. Most disruption indicators measure demand-side disruption, or they conflate demand-side and supply-side disruption. There is currently no published guidance on measuring supply-side disruption. The primary objective of this review was to identify methods and approaches used to measure supply-side service disruptions to maternal and newborn health services in the context of COVID-19.Design We carried out a systematic review and have created a typology of measurement methods and approaches using narrative synthesis.Data sources We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Global Health in January 2023. We also searched the grey literature.Eligibility criteria We included empirical studies describing the measurement of supply-side service disruption of maternal and newborn health services in LMICs in the context of COVID-19.Data extraction and synthesis We extracted the aim, method(s), setting, and study outcome(s) from included studies. We synthesised findings by type of measure (ie, provision or quality of services) and methodological approach (ie, qualitative or quantitative).Results We identified 28 studies describing 5 approaches to measuring supply-side disruption: (1) cross-sectional surveys of the nature and experience of supply-side disruption, (2) surveys to measure temporal changes in service provision or quality, (3) surveys to create composite disruption scores, (4) surveys of service users to measure receipt of services, and (5) clinical observation of the provision and quality of services.Conclusion Our review identified methods and approaches for measuring supply-side service disruption of maternal and newborn health services. These indicators provide important information about the causes and extent of supply-side disruption and provide a useful starting point for developing specific guidance on the measurement of service disruption in LMICs.All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. Not applicable.