@article {Jonese063014, author = {Nicholas Jones and Jason Oke and Seren Marsh and Kurosh Nikbin and Jonathan Bowley and H Paul Dijkstra and FD Richard Hobbs and Trisha Greenhalgh}, title = {Face masks while exercising trial (MERIT): a cross-over randomised controlled study}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, elocation-id = {e063014}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063014}, publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group}, abstract = {Objectives Physical exertion is a high-risk activity for aerosol emission of respiratory pathogens. We aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of healthy young adults wearing different types of face mask during moderate-to-high intensity exercise.Design Cross-over randomised controlled study, completed between June 2021 and January 2022.Participants Volunteers aged 18{\textendash}35 years, who exercised regularly and had no significant pre-existing health conditions.Interventions Comparison of wearing a surgical, cloth and filtering face piece (FFP3) mask to no mask during 4{\texttimes}15 min bouts of exercise. Exercise was running outdoors or indoor rowing at moderate-to-high intensity, with consistency of distance travelled between bouts confirmed using a smartphone application (Strava). Each participant completed each bout in random order.Outcomes The primary outcome was change in oxygen saturations. Secondary outcomes were change in heart rate, perceived impact of face mask wearing during exercise and willingness to wear a face mask for future exercise.Results All 72 volunteers (mean age 23.9) completed the study. Changes in oxygen saturations did not exceed the prespecified non-inferiority margin (2\% difference) with any mask type compared with no mask. At the end of exercise, the estimated average difference in oxygen saturations for cloth mask was -0.07\% (95\% CI -0.39\% to 0.25\%), for surgical 0.28\% (-0.04\% to 0.60\%) and for FFP3 -0.21\% (-0.53\% to 0.11\%). The corresponding estimated average difference in heart rate for cloth mask was -1.20 bpm (95\% CI -4.56 to 2.15), for surgical 0.36 bpm (95\% CI -3.01 to 3.73) and for FFP3 0.52 bpm (95\% CI -2.85 to 3.89). Wearing a face mask caused additional symptoms such as breathlessness (n=13, 18\%) and dizziness (n=7, 10\%). 33 participants broadly supported face mask wearing during exercise, particularly indoors, but 22 were opposed.Conclusion This study adds to previous findings (mostly from non-randomised studies) that exercising at moderate-to-high intensity wearing a face mask appears to be safe in healthy, young adults.Trial registration number NCT04932226Data are available on reasonable request.}, issn = {2044-6055}, URL = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/1/e063014}, eprint = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/1/e063014.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Open} }