@article {Zadroe054032, author = {Joshua Zadro and Caitlin Jones and Ian Harris and Rachelle Buchbinder and Denise A O{\textquoteright}Connor and Kirsten McCaffery and Rachel Thompson and Sascha Karunaratne and Min Jiat Teng and Christopher Maher and Tammy Hoffmann}, title = {Development of a patient decision aid on subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery: an international mixed-methods study}, volume = {11}, number = {8}, elocation-id = {e054032}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054032}, publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group}, abstract = {Objective To develop and user test a patient decision aid for people with subacromial pain syndrome that presents evidence-based information on the benefits and harms of subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery.Design Mixed-methods study outlining the development of a patient decision aid.Setting We assembled a multidisciplinary steering group, and used existing decision aids and decision science to draft the decision aid. Participants were recruited through social media (not restricted by country nor setting), local hospitals and the authors{\textquoteright} collaboration network.Participants People with shoulder pain and health professionals who manage people with shoulder pain.Primary and secondary outcomes We interviewed participants to gather feedback on the decision aid, assessed useability and acceptability (using qualitative and quantitative methods) and performed iterative cycles of redrafting the decision aid and reinterviewing participants as necessary. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively.Results We interviewed 26 health professionals (11 physiotherapists, 7 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 general practitioners, 3 chiropractors and 1 osteopath) and 14 people with shoulder pain. Most health professionals and people with shoulder pain rated all aspects of decision aid acceptability as adequate-to-excellent (eg, length, presentation, comprehensibility). Interviews highlighted agreement among health professionals and people with shoulder pain on most aspects of the decision aid (eg, treatment options, summary of benefits, harms and practical issues, questions to ask a health professional, graphics, formatting). However, some aspects of the decision aid elicited divergent views among health professionals (eg, causes and symptoms of shoulder pain, evidence on benefits and harms).Conclusion This decision aid could be an acceptable and valuable tool for helping people with subacromial pain syndrome make informed treatment choices. A randomised controlled trial evaluating whether this decision aid reduces people{\textquoteright}s intentions to undergo shoulder surgery and facilitates informed treatment choices is underway. Trial registration number ACTRN12621000992808Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.}, issn = {2044-6055}, URL = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e054032}, eprint = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e054032.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Open} }