RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Retrospective delirium ascertainment from case notes: a retrospective cohort study
JF BMJ Open
JO BMJ Open
FD British Medical Journal Publishing Group
SP e042440
DO 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042440
VO 11
IS 5
A1 ,
YR 2021
UL http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e042440.abstract
AB Objectives This study sets out to ascertain if recognition of delirium impacts on patient outcomes.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Unscheduled admissions to acute care trust/secondary care UK hospitals.Participants Six hundred and fifty-six older adults aged ≥65 years admitted on 14 September 2018.Measurements Delirium was ascertained retrospectively from case notes using medical notes. Documented delirium was classified as recognised delirium and retrospectively ascertained delirium was classified as unrecognised delirium.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measure: inpatient mortality. Secondary outcome measures: length of stay, discharge destination.Results Delirium was present in 21.1% (132/626) of patients at any point during admission. The presence of delirium was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.65, CI 1.40 to 5.01). Recognition of delirium did not significantly impact on outcomes.Conclusions Delirium is associated with adverse outcomes in hospitalised older adults. However, there is insufficient evidence that recognition of delirium affects outcomes. However, delirium recognition presents an opportunity to discuss a person’s overall prognosis and discuss this with the patient and their family. Further research is needed to assess the pathophysiology of delirium to enable development of targeted interventions towards improved outcomes in patients with delirium.The anonymised database is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.