PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rosanne van Maanen
AU  - Anna E C Kingma
AU  - Ruud Oudega
AU  - Frans H Rutten
AU  - Karel Moons
AU  - Geert-Jan Geersing
TI  - Real-life impact of clinical prediction rules for venous thromboembolism in primary care: a cross-sectional cohort study
AID  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039913
DP  - 2020 Dec 01
TA  - BMJ Open
PG  - e039913
VI  - 10
IP  - 12
4099  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e039913.short
4100  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e039913.full
SO  - BMJ Open2020 Dec 01; 10
AB  - Objective Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) followed by D-dimer testing were shown to safely rule out venous thromboembolism (VTE) in about half of all suspected patients in controlled and experienced study settings. Yet, its real-life impact in primary care is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the real-life impact of CPRs for suspected VTE in primary care.Design Cross-sectional cohort study.Setting Primary care in the Netherlands.Participants Patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis (n=993) and suspected pulmonary embolism (n=484).Interventions General practitioners received an educational instruction on how to use CPRs in suspected VTE. We did not rectify incorrect application of the CPR in order to mimic daily clinical care.Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were the diagnostic failure rate, defined as the 3-month incidence of VTE in the non-referred group, and the efficiency, defined as the proportion of non-referred patients in the total study population. Secondary outcomes were determinants for and consequences of incorrect application of the CPRs.Results In 267 of the included 1477 patients, VTE was confirmed. When CPRs were correctly applied, the failure rate was 1.51% (95% CI 0.77 to 2.86), and the efficiency was 58.1% (95% CI 55.2 to 61.0). However, the CPRs were incorrectly applied in 339 patients, which resulted in an increased failure rate of 3.31% (95% CI 1.07 to 8.76) and a decreased efficiency of 35.7% (95% CI 30.6 to 41.1). The presence of concurrent heart failure increased the likelihood of incorrect application (adjusted OR 3.26; 95% CI 1.47 to 7.21).Conclusions Correct application of CPRs for VTE in primary care is associated with an acceptable low failure rate at a high efficiency. Importantly, in nearly a quarter of patients, the CPRs were incorrectly applied that resulted in a higher failure rate and a considerably lower efficiency.