PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Lucy Karwatowska
AU  - Simon Russell
AU  - Francesca Solmi
AU  - Bianca Lucia De Stavola
AU  - Sara Jaffee
AU  - Jean-Baptiste Pingault
AU  - Essi Viding
TI  - Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
AID  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258
DP  - 2020 Sep 01
TA  - BMJ Open
PG  - e038258
VI  - 10
IP  - 9
4099  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e038258.short
4100  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e038258.full
SO  - BMJ Open2020 Sep 01; 10
AB  - Introduction Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an escalating major public health concern and it is important to understand what factors may influence the risk of these behaviours. Such research would inform interventions that aim to prevent the development of disruptive behaviours. The current review will identify the most stringent evidence of putative risk factors for disruptive behaviour from quasi-experimental studies, which enable stronger causal inference.Methods and analysis The review will be carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of references published between 1 January 1980 and 1 March 2020 will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Initial abstract and title screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI)-Reviewer 4 software. Quasi-experimental studies in the English language examining the association between any putative risk factor and a clearly defined measure of disruptive behaviour (eg, a validated questionnaire measure) will be included. We will conduct meta-analyses if we can pool a minimum of three similar studies with the same or similar exposures and outcomes.Ethics and dissemination The proposed review does not require ethical approval. The results will help to identify risk factors for which there is strong evidence of causal effects on disruptive behaviours and also highlight potential risk factors that require further research. The findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and through presentations at international meetings and conferences.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020169313.