PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - M Austin Argentieri AU - Bobak Seddighzadeh AU - Sarah Noveroske Philbrick AU - Tracy Balboni AU - Alexandra Shields TI - A Roadmap for conducting psychosocial research in epidemiological studies: perspectives of cohort study principal investigators AID - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037235 DP - 2020 Jul 01 TA - BMJ Open PG - e037235 VI - 10 IP - 7 4099 - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/7/e037235.short 4100 - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/7/e037235.full SO - BMJ Open2020 Jul 01; 10 AB - Background Psychosocial adversity disproportionately affects racial/ethnic and socioeconomic minorities in the USA, and therefore understanding the mechanisms through which psychosocial stress and resilience influence human health can provide meaningful insights into addressing US health disparities. Despite this promise, psychosocial factors are infrequently and unsystematically collected in the US prospective cohort studies.Methods We sought to understand prospective cohort principal investigators’ (PIs’) attitudes regarding the importance of psychosocial influences on disease aetiology, in order to identify barriers and opportunities for greater inclusion of these domains in high-quality epidemiological research. One-hour, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 PIs representing 24 US prospective cohort studies funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), collectively capturing health data on 1.25 of every 100 American adults. A hypothesis-free, grounded theory approach was used to analyse and interpret interview data.Results Most cohort PIs view psychosocial factors as an important research area to further our understanding of disease aetiology and agree that this research will be crucial for future public health innovations. Virtually all PIs emphasised that future psychosocial research will need to elucidate biological and behavioural mechanisms in order to be taken seriously by the epidemiological community more broadly. A lack of pertinent funding mechanisms and a lack of consensus on optimal scales and measures of psychosocial factors were identified as additional barriers to advancing psychosocial research.Conclusions Our interviews emphasised the need for: (1) high-quality, longitudinal studies that investigate biological mechanisms and pathways through which psychosocial factors influence health, (2) effort among epidemiological cohorts to broaden and harmonise the measures they use across cohorts, to facilitate replication of results and (3) the need for targeted funding opportunities from NIH and other grant-making institutions to study these domains.