PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kath Checkland
AU  - Jonathan Hammond
AU  - Lynsey Warwick-Giles
AU  - Simon Bailey
TI  - Exploring the multiple policy objectives for primary care networks: a qualitative interview study with national policy stakeholders
AID  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038398
DP  - 2020 Jul 01
TA  - BMJ Open
PG  - e038398
VI  - 10
IP  - 7
4099  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/7/e038398.short
4100  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/7/e038398.full
SO  - BMJ Open2020 Jul 01; 10
AB  - Objectives English general practice is suffering a workforce crisis, with general practitioners retiring early and trainees reluctant to enter the profession. To address this, additional funding has been offered, but only through participation in collaborations known as primary care networks (PCNs). This study explored national policy objectives underpinning PCNs and the mechanisms expected to help achieve these, from the perspective of those driving the policy.Design Qualitative semistructured interviews and policy document analysis.Setting and participants National-level policy maker and stakeholder interviewees (n=16). Policy document analysis of the Network Contract Direct Enhanced Service draft service specifications.Analysis Interviews were transcribed, coded and organised thematically according to policy objectives and mechanisms. Thematic data were organised into a matrix so prominent elements can be identified and emphasised accordingly. Themes were considered alongside objectives embedded in PCN draft service delivery requirements.Results Three themes of policy objectives and associated mechanisms were identified: (1) supporting general practice, (2) place-based interorganisational collaboration and (3) primary care ‘voice’. Interviewees emphasised and sequenced themes differently, suggesting meeting objectives for one was necessary to realise another. Interviewees most closely linked to primary care emphasised the importance of theme 1. The objectives embedded in draft service delivery requirements primarily emphasised theme 2.Conclusions These policy objectives are not mutually exclusive but may imply different approaches to prioritising investment or necessitate more explicit temporal sequencing, with the stabilisation of a struggling primary care sector probably needing to occur before meaningful engagement with other community service providers can be achieved or a ‘collective voice’ is agreed. Multiple objectives create space for stakeholders to feel dissatisfied when implementation details do not match expectations, as the negative reaction to draft service delivery requirements illustrates. Our study offers policy makers suggestions about how confidence in the policy might be restored by crafting delivery requirements so all groups see opportunities to meet favoured objectives.