TY - JOUR T1 - Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study JF - BMJ Open JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028623 VL - 9 IS - 11 SP - e028623 AU - Angus G K McNair AU - Robert N Whistance AU - Barry Main AU - Rachael Forsythe AU - Rhiannon Macefield AU - Jonathan Rees AU - Anne Pullyblank AU - Kerry Avery AU - Sara Brookes AU - Michael G Thomas AU - Paul A Sylvester AU - Ann Russell AU - Alfred Oliver AU - Dion Morton AU - Robin Kennedy AU - David Jayne AU - Richard Huxtable AU - Roland Hackett AU - Susan Dutton AU - Mark G Coleman AU - Mia Card AU - Julia Brown AU - Jane Blazeby Y1 - 2019/11/01 UR - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/11/e028623.abstract N2 - Objective ‘Core information sets’ (CISs) represent baseline information, agreed by patients and professionals, to stimulate individualised patient-centred discussions. This study developed a CIS for use before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.Design Three phase consensus study: (1) Systematic literature reviews and patient interviews to identify potential information of importance to patients, (2) UK national Delphi survey of patients and professionals to rate the importance of the information, (3) international consensus meeting to agree on the final CIS.Setting UK CRC centres.Participants Purposive sampling was conducted to ensure CRC centre representation based upon geographical region and caseload volume. Responses were received from 63/81 (78%) centres (90 professionals). Adult patients who had undergone CRC surgery were eligible, and purposive sampling was conducted to ensure representation based on age, sex and cancer location (rectum, left and right colon). Responses were received from 97/267 (35%) patients with a wide age range (29–87), equal sex ratio and cancer location. Attendees of the international Tripartite Colorectal Conference were eligible for the consensus meeting.Outcomes Phase 1: Information of potential importance to patients was extracted verbatim and operationalised into a Delphi questionnaire. Phase 2: Patients and professionals rated the importance information on a 9-point Likert scale, and resurveyed following group feedback. Information rated of low importance were discarded using predefined criteria. Phase 3: A modified nominal group technique was used to gain final consensus in separate consensus meetings with patients and professionals.Results Data sources identified 1216 pieces of information that informed a 98-item questionnaire. Analysis led to 50 and 23 information domains being retained after the first and second surveys, respectively. The final CIS included 11 concepts including specific surgical complications, short and long-term survival, disease recurrence, stoma and quality of life issues.Conclusions This study has established a CIS for professionals to discuss with patients before CRC surgery. ER -