PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Katherine Woolf
AU  - Rowena Viney
AU  - Antonia Rich
AU  - Hirosha Jayaweera
AU  - Ann Griffin
TI  - Organisational perspectives on addressing differential attainment in postgraduate medical education: a qualitative study in the UK
AID  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021314
DP  - 2018 Mar 01
TA  - BMJ Open
PG  - e021314
VI  - 8
IP  - 3
4099  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/3/e021314.short
4100  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/3/e021314.full
SO  - BMJ Open2018 Mar 01; 8
AB  - Objectives To explore how representatives from organisations with responsibility for doctors in training perceive risks to the educational progression of UK medical graduates from black and minority ethnic groups (BME UKGs), and graduates of non-UK medical schools (international medical graduates (IMGs)). To identify the barriers to and facilitators of change.Design Qualitative semistructured individual and group interview study.Setting Postgraduate medical education in the UK.Participants Individuals with roles in examinations and/or curriculum design from UK medical Royal Colleges. Employees of NHS Employers.Results Representatives from 11 medical Royal Colleges (n=29) and NHS Employers (n=2) took part (55% medically qualified, 61% male, 71% white British/Irish, 23% Asian/Asian British, 6% missing ethnicity). Risks were perceived as significant, although more so for IMGs than for BME UKGs. Participants based significance ratings on evidence obtained largely through personal experience. A lack of evidence led to downgrading of significance. Participants were pessimistic about effecting change, two main barriers being sensitivities around race and the isolation of interventions. Participants felt that organisations should acknowledge problems, but felt concerned about being transparent without a solution; and talking about race with trainees was felt to be difficult. Participants mentioned 63 schemes aiming to address differential attainment, but these were typically local or specialty-specific, were not aimed at BME UKGs and were largely unevaluated. Participants felt that national change was needed, but only felt empowered to effect change locally or within their specialty.Conclusions Representatives from organisations responsible for training doctors perceived the risks faced by BME UKGs and IMGs as significant but difficult to change. Strategies to help organisations address these risks include: increased openness to discussing race (including ethnic differences in attainment among UKGs); better sharing of information and resources nationally to empower organisations to effect change locally and within specialties; and evaluation of evidence-based interventions.