RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Trends and determinants of length of stay and hospital reimbursement following knee and hip replacement: evidence from linked primary care and NHS hospital records from 1997 to 2014
JF BMJ Open
JO BMJ Open
FD British Medical Journal Publishing Group
SP e019146
DO 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019146
VO 8
IS 1
A1 Edward Burn
A1 Christopher J Edwards
A1 David W Murray
A1 Alan Silman
A1 Cyrus Cooper
A1 Nigel K Arden
A1 Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
A1 Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
YR 2018
UL http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/1/e019146.abstract
AB Objectives To measure changes in length of stay following total knee and hip replacement (TKR and THR) between 1997 and 2014 and estimate the impact on hospital reimbursement, all else being equal. Further, to assess the degree to which observed trends can be explained by improved efficiency or changes in patient profiles.Design Cross-sectional study using routinely collected data.Setting National Health Service primary care records from 1995 to 2014 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink were linked to hospital inpatient data from 1997 to 2014 in Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care.Participants Study participants had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.Interventions Primary TKR, primary THR, revision TKR and revision THR.Primary outcome measures Length of stay and hospital reimbursement.Results 10 260 primary TKR, 10 961 primary THR, 505 revision TKR and 633 revision THR were included. Expected length of stay fell from 16.0 days (95% CI 14.9 to 17.2) in 1997 to 5.4 (5.2 to 5.6) in 2014 for primary TKR and from 14.4 (13.7 to 15.0) to 5.6 (5.4 to 5.8) for primary THR, leading to savings of £1537 and £1412, respectively. Length of stay fell from 29.8 (17.5 to 50.5) to 11.0 (8.3 to 14.6) for revision TKR and from 18.3 (11.6 to 28.9) to 12.5 (9.3 to 16.8) for revision THR, but no significant reduction in reimbursement was estimated. The estimated effect of year of surgery remained similar when patient characteristics were included.Conclusions Length of stay for joint replacement fell substantially from 1997 to 2014. These reductions have translated into substantial savings. While patient characteristics affect length of stay and reimbursement, patient profiles have remained broadly stable over time. The observed reductions appear to be mostly explained by improved efficiency.