TY - JOUR T1 - Key factors of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a thematic analysis review JF - BMJ Open JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017762 VL - 7 IS - 10 SP - e017762 AU - Catherine Hudon AU - Maud-Christine Chouinard AU - Mireille Lambert AU - Fatoumata Diadiou AU - Danielle Bouliane AU - Jérémie Beaudin Y1 - 2017/10/01 UR - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/10/e017762.abstract N2 - Objective The aim of this paper was to identify the key factors of case management (CM) interventions among frequent users of healthcare services found in empirical studies of effectiveness.Design Thematic analysis review of CM studies.Methods We built on a previously published review that aimed to report the effectiveness of CM interventions for frequent users of healthcare services, using the Medline, Scopus and CINAHL databases covering the January 2004–December 2015 period, then updated to July 2017, with the keywords ‘CM’ and ‘frequent use’. We extracted factors of successful (n=7) and unsuccessful (n=6) CM interventions and conducted a mixed thematic analysis to synthesise findings. Chaudoir’s implementation of health innovations framework was used to organise results into four broad levels of factors: (1) ,environmental/organisational level, (2) practitioner level, (3) patient level and (4) programme level.Results Access to, and close partnerships with, healthcare providers and community services resources were key factors of successful CM interventions that should target patients with the greatest needs and promote frequent contacts with the healthcare team. The selection and training of the case manager was also an important factor to foster patient engagement in CM. Coordination of care, self-management support and assistance with care navigation were key CM activities. The main issues reported by unsuccessful CM interventions were problems with case finding or lack of care integration.Conclusions CM interventions for frequent users of healthcare services should ensure adequate case finding processes, rigorous selection and training of the case manager, sufficient intensity of the intervention, as well as good care integration among all partners. Other studies could further evaluate the influence of contextual factors on intervention impacts. ER -