TY - JOUR T1 - β€œIt is merely a paper tiger.” Battle for increased tobacco advertising regulation in Indonesia: content analysis of news articles JF - BMJ Open JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016975 VL - 7 IS - 9 SP - e016975 AU - Putu Ayu Swandewi Astuti AU - Becky Freeman Y1 - 2017/09/01 UR - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/9/e016975.abstract N2 - Objective At the end of 2012, the Indonesian government enacted tobacco control regulation (PP 109/2012) that included stricter tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) controls. The PP did not ban all forms of TAPS and generated a great deal of media interest from both supporters and detractors. This study aims to analyse stakeholder arguments regarding the adoption and implementation of the regulation as presented through news media converge.Design Content analysis of 213 news articles reporting on TAPS and the PP that were available from the Factiva database and the Google News search engine.Setting Indonesia, 24 December 2012–29 February 2016.Methods Arguments presented in the news article about the adoption and implementation of the PP were coded into 10 supportive and 9 opposed categories. The news actors presenting the arguments were also recorded. Kappa statistic were calculated for intercoder reliability.Results Of the 213 relevant news articles, 202 included stakeholder arguments, with a total of 436 arguments coded across the articles. More than two-thirds, 69% (301) of arguments were in support of the regulation, and of those, 32.6% (98) agreed that the implementation should be enhanced. Of 135 opposed arguments, the three most common were the potential decrease in government revenue at 26.7% (36), disadvantage to the tobacco industry at 18.5% (25) and concern for tobacco farmers and workers welfare at 11.1% (15). The majority of the in support arguments were made by national government, tobacco control advocates and journalists, while the tobacco industry made most opposing arguments.Conclusions Analysing the arguments and news actors provides a mapping of support and opposition to an essential tobacco control policy instrument. Advocates, especially in a fragmented and expansive geographic area like Indonesia, can use these findings to enhance local tobacco control efforts. ER -