@article {Hoffmane013445, author = {Mariana Hoffman and Gabriela Chaves and Giane Amorim Ribeiro-Samora and Raquel Rodrigues Britto and Ver{\^o}nica Franco Parreira}, title = {Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in lung transplant candidates: a systematic review}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, elocation-id = {e013445}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013445}, publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group}, abstract = {Objectives The aim of this systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and quasi-experimental and retrospective studies is to investigate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with advanced chronic disease on the waiting list for lung transplantation.Setting PR performed for inpatient or outpatient lung transplant candidates.Intervention PR programme including aerobic exercise training and/or resistance exercise training.Primary and secondary outcomes Quality of life and exercise capacity (primary outcomes). Survival rate after transplant surgery; pulmonary function; respiratory muscle strength; psychological aspects; upper and lower extremity muscle strength and adverse effects (secondary outcomes). Two review authors independently selected the studies, assessed study quality and extracted data. Studies in any language were included.Results This was a systematic review and studies were searched on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDro. Experimental and retrospective studies evaluating the effects of PR in candidates for lung transplantation (\>18 years old) with any lung diseases were included. 2 RCTs, and two quasi-experimental and two retrospectives studies, involving 1305 participants were included in the review. 5 studies included an enhancement reported in quality of life using the Short Form 36 questionnaire and showed improvements in some domains. All studies included exercise capacity evaluated through 6 min walk test and in five of them, there were improvements in this outcome after PR. Owing to the different characteristics of the studies, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis.Conclusions Studies included in this review showed that PR is an effective treatment option for patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation and can improve quality of life and exercise capacity in those patients. Although individual studies reported positive effects of PR, this review shows that there is a need for more studies of a high methodological quality addressing PR effects in lung transplant candidates.Trial registration number PROSPERO CDR42015025110.}, issn = {2044-6055}, URL = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/2/e013445}, eprint = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/2/e013445.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Open} }