Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Body composition: population epidemiology and concordance in Australian children aged 11–12 years and their parents
  1. Susan A Clifford1,2,
  2. Alanna N Gillespie1,2,
  3. Timothy Olds1,3,
  4. Anneke C Grobler1,
  5. Melissa Wake1,2,4
  1. 1 Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2 Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  4. 4 Department of Paediatrics and The Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Professor Melissa Wake; melissa.wake{at}


Objectives Overweight and obesity remain at historically high levels, cluster within families and are established risk factors for multiple diseases. We describe the epidemiology and cross-generational concordance of body composition among Australian children aged 11–12 years and their parents.

Design The population-based cross-sectional Child Health CheckPoint study, nested within the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC).

Setting Assessment centres in seven major Australian cities and eight regional cities, or home visits; February 2015–March 2016.

Participants Of all participating CheckPoint families (n=1874), body composition data were available for 1872 children (49% girls) and 1852 parents (mean age 43.7 years; 88% mothers), including 1830 biological parent-child pairs.

Measures Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio for all participants; body fat and fat-free mass by four-limb bioimpedence analysis (BIA) at assessment centres, or body fat percentage by two-limb BIA at home visits. Analysis: parent-child concordance was assessed using (i) Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and (ii) partial correlation coefficients adjusted for age, sex and socioeconomic disadvantage. Survey weights and methods accounted for LSAC’s complex sample design.

Results 20.7% of children were overweight and 6.2% obese, as were 33.5% and 31.6% of parents. Boys and girls showed similar distributions for all body composition measures but, despite similar BMI and waist-to-height ratio, mothers had higher proportions of total and truncal fat than fathers. Parent-child partial correlations were greatest for height (0.37, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.42). Other anthropometric and fat/lean measures showed strikingly similar partial correlations, ranging from 0.25 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.29) for waist circumference to 0.30 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.34) for fat-free percentage. Whole-sample and sex-specific percentile values are provided for all measures.

Conclusions Excess adiposity remains prevalent in Australian children and parents. Moderate cross-generational concordance across all measures of leanness and adiposity is already evident by late childhood.

  • body composition
  • adiposity
  • reference values
  • children
  • inheritance patterns
  • epidemiologic studies

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • The nation-wide, population-based cohort was recruited using a two-stage random sampling design, enhancing generalisability of estimates.

  • Multiple body composition attributes were objectively measured in children and parents, including body mass index and more detailed measures of segmental fat and fat-free mass and distribution from bioelectrical impedance analysis.

  • Only one parent of each child was included in the cross-generational concordance analyses, so we cannot formally estimate heritability.

  • Our parent sample comprised mostly mothers, so estimates of fathers' body composition are less precise.

  • Our findings may not generalise to Australian adults who are not parents.


While the proximal cause of overweight is a sustained energy imbalance, overweight clusters in families and clearly both genetic heritability and shared environmental factors contribute to this clustering. Although genetic polymorphisms associated with body composition are being identified,1 2 the degree of heritability of body mass index (BMI) between parents and children is surprisingly unclear, with estimates ranging from 0.21 to 0.81 between studies.3 Likewise, parent-child concordance (reflecting both shared genetic and environmental contributions) in two key drivers of body composition—physical activity4 and dietary patterns5 —have shown substantial heterogeneity between cohorts in recent meta-analyses.

The epidemiology of obesity—and of body composition more broadly—continues to evolve rapidly. Following steep rises starting around 1980 in all age groups,6 childhood overweight and obesity has plateaued since around 2005 and increments in adults have slowed, but both remain at historically high levels. For example, 2014–15 Australian estimates are that 27% of children aged 5–17 years are overweight (including 7% obese), as are 63% of adults (including 28% obese),7 with nearly 60% of today’s children likely be obese by age 35 years.8 Population dietary, eating, activity and fitness patterns also continue to evolve—all of which could impact lean and fat mass in different ways, and all of which show varying degrees of environmental and genetic influences.

It is therefore surprising that, while many studies have looked at individual body composition measures (most commonly BMI) in parent-child pairs,9–12 few have considered a broad range of whole-of-body and segmental body composition measures in a contemporary population-representative sample. Multiple measures are required as fat has differential health impacts depending on where it is deposited throughout the body,13 for example, abdominal fat measures (such as waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio) more strongly predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality than BMI.14 15 The few studies with multiple body composition measures in both parents and children have assessed body fat using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry or skinfold thickness16–18 (used in research but not clinical settings). We have identified no parent-child concordance studies incorporating bioimpedence analysis (BIA, commonly used in population and household settings) for assessing body fat and lean tissue mass and distribution.

Parent-child correlations in body composition differ by sex, parent and offspring ages, and specific aspect of body composition measured.3 Height (correlation coefficient (CC) 0.29 to 0.51)9 16 17 19 and fat-free mass (CC 0.21 to 0.48)17 20 may be more strongly correlated than BMI (CC 0.19 to 0.44)10 17–22 and weight (CC 0.29 to 0.42),10 17 22 although estimates vary and overlap to a great extent between studies. Estimates of parent-child correlation on measures of body fat are slightly lower but again overlap with all other measures (body fat percentage CC 0.23 to 0.34,17 20 waist circumference CC 0.14 to 0.3219–21 and fat mass CC 0.16 to 0.30).17 20 Longitudinal studies with repeated parent-child BMI concordance report that associations strengthen with child age (from CC 0.15 to 0.28 between ages 5 and 9,9 CC 0.25 to 0.34 between ages 6–9 and 10–11,22 CC 0.31 to 0.36 between ages 9–10 and 15–1618 and CC 0.33 to 0.43 between ages 15 and 22 years23), presumably reflecting puberty-related changes towards a more adult-like physiology in the offspring.22 Offspring may not come to resemble parents more beyond this age; in the Midspan Family Study of Scottish parents aged 45–64 years and offspring at ages 30–59 years, regression coefficients for BMI concordance ranged from 0.26 to 0.35 depending on sex of parent and child.24 Several studies have reported mother-child concordance in BMI to be higher than father-child concordance,9 11 18 postulating intrauterine environmental effects, but other studies report no difference10 19 or stronger father-child associations.21 There is also mixed evidence for24 25 and against26 gender-assortative concordance in body composition, that is, a stronger association in mother-daughter and father-son pairs than mother-son and father-daughter pairs. Sex differences in the concordance of body compositional measures other than BMI remain relatively unexplored.

The Child Health CheckPoint, a cross-sectional biophysical wave nested within the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC), provided an opportunity to include multiple measures of body composition in a broadly-focused health assessment of parent-child dyads at child age 11–12 years. Here, we aimed to describe, in a population-derived sample of Australian children aged 11–12 years and their parents, (i) the epidemiology (population prevalence and distributional statistics) of body composition measures and (ii) parent-child concordance in these measures.


LSAC study design and participants

Detailed information about the initial LSAC recruitment and study design is available elsewhere.27 28 Briefly, a population-representative sample of children aged 0–1 and 4–5 years were recruited into LSAC’s B and K cohort, respectively. A two-stage random sampling design was employed, using postcode as the primary sampling unit. For the B cohort, 8921 families were invited to participate, of which 5107 (57.2%) were recruited into the first data collection wave in 2004. Additional data collection waves have occurred every 2 years since.

CheckPoint study design and participant recruitment

The Child Health CheckPoint was a physical health and biomarkers module offered to the B cohort between LSAC waves 6 and 7. The CheckPoint data collection spanned February 2015 to March 2016. During the 2014 wave 6 visit, B cohort families (n=3764) were introduced to the upcoming CheckPoint and asked to consent to their contact details being shared with the CheckPoint team. From late 2014, consenting families (n=3513) received an information pack and recruitment phone call (figure 1). A more detailed description of the CheckPoint study design is available elsewhere.29 30

Figure 1

Participant flow. *Data from 20 non-biological child-parent pairs excluded from concordance analyses. c= number of children; HV= Home visit assessment; LSAC= Longitudinal Study of Australian Children; MAC= Main assessment centre; mAC= Mini assessment centre; n= number of families; p=number of attending adults.


Parents provided informed written consent for their child’s and their own study participation.

Patient and public involvement

Because LSAC is a population-based longitudinal study, no patient groups were involved in its design or conduct. To our knowledge, the public was not involved in the study design, recruitment or conduct of LSAC study or its CheckPoint module. Parents received a summary health report for their child and themselves at or soon after the CheckPoint assessment visit. They consented to take part knowing that they would not otherwise receive individual results about themselves or their child.


The main CheckPoint data collection mechanism was the ’pop-up' assessment centre. Families completed a 3½ hour visit at an assessment centre set up sequentially in seven major Australian cities, or a 2¾ hour visit at a mini-assessment centre set up in eight regional cities. Families unable to attend an assessment centre were offered a 1½ hour home visit. At the assessment centre, participants completed numerous measurements of multiple body systems in a standard sequence that differed slightly for children and parents. Participants advanced every 15 min from one station to the next, starting with the body composition station ‘Measure Up’. Children and parents completed a brief questionnaire administered on an iPad using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool31 during downtime throughout the visit, or at the end of the visit.


Height, weight, BIA and waist circumference were measured at the beginning of the CheckPoint centre/home visit, using standard protocols similar to previous LSAC waves (CheckPoint protocols are described in table 1). These data were used to derive BMI (kg/m2), total fat mass percentage, truncal fat percentage and waist-to-height ratio. For children, we also generated BMI and waist z-scores for age and sex using historical reference datasets. As child height, weight and waist circumference are expected to change throughout development, it is common practice within the paediatric literature to analyse z-scores, which allow tracking of an individual child’s adiposity over time and comparison between children of different ages. The Measure Up data collection and management standard operating procedures provide more detailed information (see

Table 1

Study measures and protocols

An estimate of 300 g was subtracted from measured body weight for two children wearing a plaster cast. Two parents with pacemakers were weighed but BIA analysis was not conducted as the BIA electrical current may affect the operation of the device. Five pregnant women, and five parents who refused measurement but instead self-reported their height and weight, were excluded from our analyses.

Covariates: age and sex were self-reported in the questionnaire (parents) or LSAC provided these data exported from administrative databases (children). Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage was linked to publicly available Australian Bureau of Statistics Census data. Child pubertal status was self-reported in the questionnaire. These covariates were measured at the CheckPoint visit (table 1); no LSAC data are analysed in this study.

Statistical analysis

For aim 1, we described the distributions of body composition domains in children and parents using mean values and SD, as well as key percentiles. These population summary statistics were calculated using weighted multilevel survey analyses that took clustering in the sampling frame and stratification into account. The analytic sample comprised all study children and attending parents (any adult who attended with the study child) with data for at least one measure of height, weight, BIA or waist circumference.

For aim 2, concordance between parents and children was quantified for (i) the sample overall and (ii) subgroups by child and parent sex, using Pearson’s correlation coefficients (CC) with 95% CIs, and partial correlation coefficients, adjusted for child and parent age, Disadvantage Index and for child and parent sex in models including both sexes; with 95% bootstrapped CIs. In addition, aim 2 analyses were repeated using weighted multilevel survey analyses.32 The unweighted and weighted results were similar, so we present the unweighted analyses. The aim 2 analytic sample consisted of all biological parent-child pairs with complete data for at least one measurement.

All analyses were performed using Stata V.14.2.


A total of 1874 parent-child pairs participated in the Child Health CheckPoint module. Figure 1 summarises the sample size and reasons for non-response at various stages of the study, and reasons for missing body composition data within the CheckPoint module. Data for at least one body composition measure are available for 1872 children and 1852 parents, including 1830 biological parent-child pairs.

There was a similar proportion of boys and girls, but 88% of parents were mothers (table 2). The average age of children was 12.0 years, and fathers were 3 years older than mothers, on average. A greater proportion of girls (89%) than boys (48%) were in the mid-late stages of pubertal development. The sample was somewhat less socioeconomically disadvantaged than the general population, with 26% of the sample in the least disadvantaged national quintile but only 12% in the most disadvantaged quintile.

Table 2

Sample characteristics, stratified by sex, of children and parents; values are mean (SD), except where specified as %

Approximately one-quarter of children and two-thirds of parents were overweight or obese (children: overweight 20.7%, obese 6.2%; parents: overweight 33.5%, obese 31.6%). Table 3 shows that, compared with fathers, mothers had a mean waist circumference approximately 12 cm less, similar waist-to-height ratio and BMI and higher proportions of total body fat (36% compared with 26%) and truncal fat (18% compared with 14%). Sex differences in these measures were much smaller in children. In regard to fat distribution, children had a greater proportion of their fat in the non-truncal regions than adults.

Table 3

Distribution of body composition markers in Australian children and parents

The distributions of BMI, waist circumference, total body fat mass and truncal fat mass are plotted in figures 2 and 3. For reference purposes, online supplementary table 1 shows the distribution of these body composition markers at key percentiles (from 5th to 95th). Among children, there were no notable sex differences in the distribution of BMI or waist z-scores, but the distribution of total and truncal fat was slightly shifted to the right (ie, greater proportion of fat) in girls compared with boys.

Supplemental material

Figure 2

Distribution of child body composition measures. Sample weights applied to data. BMI, body mass index; UK90, United Kingdom 1990.

Figure 3

Distribution of parent body composition measures. Sample weights applied to data. BMI, body mass index.

Adults showed more striking sex differences. While mothers' and fathers' mean BMI were similar (table 3), the distribution in mothers was flatter and shifted to the left (ie, lower BMI) compared with fathers. The distribution of men’s and women’s waist circumference were similar in shape, but shifted to the left (ie, smaller waists) in women. Australian guidelines recommend waist circumference below 94 and 80 cm cut-points for men and women, respectively.33 34 The median waist circumference for men and women exceeded these cut-points (online supplementary table 1), that is, 57% (95% CI 50 to 65) of men and 61% (95% CI 58 to 63) of women in the parent sample exceeded recommendations.

Mothers and fathers had different distributions of total body and truncal fat mass. The mothers had a wider range of fat than fathers, and the distribution was shifted to the right (ie, greater proportion of fat mass). Overlap in the distributions of mothers' and fathers' fat was less than for other body composition measures.

Unadjusted correlations between child and parent body composition in the cohort overall were moderate and remarkably consistent (table 4); concordance was highest for height (CC 0.30, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.34) and lowest for waist circumference (CC 0.23, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.28). Table 4 also shows that mother-child and father-child correlations were similar for each measure, although there was a tendency for father-child waist, fat and fat-free mass estimates to be higher (but with wider CIs) than mother-child correlations. While we did not conduct formal statistical tests, sex-matched pairs (ie, mother-daughter, father-son) appeared to show similar concordance to sex-mixed pairs (ie, mother-son, father-daughter; online supplementary table 2).

Table 4

Parent-child concordance in body composition characteristics

On adjustment for age, sex and Disadvantage Index, parent-child height correlations strengthened to be clearly greater than the remaining correlations, which remained relatively unchanged and tightly clustered.


Principal findings

We describe the epidemiology of BMI, waist, fat and fat-free mass measures in a large population-based Australian cohort of parents and children, at two stages of the life course (11–12 years of age and mid-adulthood). A quarter of children and two-thirds of adults were overweight or obese on BMI criteria. We confirm known sex differences between men’s and women’s body composition.35 36 Parent-child concordance in body composition measures were moderate and strikingly similar for all measures tapping into leanness and adiposity, with partial correlations ranging from 0.25 to 0.30; the exception was higher concordance for height (0.37). Mother-child and father-child concordance patterns were similar, although estimates appeared slightly stronger for fathers than for mothers.

Strengths and weaknesses of the study

Body composition was measured in a large nationwide cohort of children and their parents originally selected to be population-representative.37 Dyads underwent multiple measures of body composition at the same time and using the same equipment and protocols, maximising generalisability and minimising biases reflecting these factors. Our BIA scales captured segmental, as well as whole-of-body, fat mass. Although the smaller numbers of fathers reduced the precision of father-child estimates, this is one of few studies to provide population estimates both for mother-child and father-child concordance for any anthropometric measurement.

Limitations included under-representation of very disadvantaged families due to selective uptake of CheckPoint and attrition in LSAC, partly mitigated by our use of survey weights (although this showed no meaningful influence on the results). We cannot extend conclusions outside the narrow child age range (11–12 years) and, as we examined parent-child dyads rather than triads, we cannot formally estimate heritability.

Comparisons with other studies

As expected, exact estimates vary across different samples, however, our results are very similar to recent local studies. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in our child (27%) and parent (65%) samples were similar to those reported in the 2014–15 Australian National Health Survey (27% of children aged 5–17 years and 63% of adults aged 18+ years) 3 years earlier.7 Our child waist circumference (mean 66.9 cm, SD 9.0 cm) was slightly smaller than that of the Australian children 11–12 years measured in the 2007 National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity survey (mean 69.1 cm, SD 10.3 cm; unpublished data, provided by co-author TO). Fifty-seven per cent (95% CI 50 to 65) of our fathers and 61% (95% CI 58 to 63) of our mothers exceeded the recommended waist cut-points of 94 and 80 cm cut-points for men and women, respectively,33 34 compared with 60% of Australian men and 65% of women aged ≥18 years in the 2014–15 survey. Total body fat percentage in our child sample are similar to, but slightly higher than, values reported for the children aged 9–11 years in the Australian subsample of the 2011–13 International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and Environment (ISCOLE) study.38 39

As previous studies have examined parent-child concordance in a single or limited number of body composition measures, ours is one of the first to show the consistency in concordance (CC 0.23 to 0.30) across a broad range of body composition measures spanning leanness to adiposity. Our concordance estimates generally fell within the ranges previously reported for each measure, except that our concordance for height fell on the lower end of the range,9 and weight just below the lower boundary reported in previous literature.9 10 16–22 Previous studies collectively show parent-child concordance in BMI strengthens with child age; our estimate of 0.29 at child age 11–12 years is consistent with previous estimates of 0.31 to 0.34 for children aged 9–10 and 10–11 years, respectively.18 22

Meaning and implications for clinicians and policymakers

This study updates summary population data on multiple body composition measures across two generations. Prevalence data for overweight and obesity are not novel, but contribute to within-country and between-country population monitoring. Population monitoring should track a range of body composition measures, not BMI alone, as these may have independent health benefits (eg, lean mass) and risk (eg, truncal fat) and can vary in the face of stable BMI in children40 and adults.41 This dataset is available to researchers from early-2019 (see the data sharing statement at the end of the article). Uses may include statistical power calculation and exploration of the shared and unique contributions of each of the body composition measures to outcomes of choice, to inform which of the multiple measures would be most appropriate for future trials.

Taken with other studies, our moderate concordances support both genetic and environmental influences on body composition measures. Older children share only some of the latter with their parents. On the one hand, parents are to some extent nutritional gatekeepers for their children; on the other, children spend a substantial amount of time at school and with peers, in homogenising environments not shared with their parents. While extreme environmental restrictions (such as body building, gastric banding42 and the Cuban blockade43) show very real malleability of body composition, long-term change is nonetheless profoundly difficult for most individuals.44 Given that each aspect of body composition likely falls under different genetic influences, it is striking that our parent-child concordances across all body compartments were nearly identical (except for height, known to be strongly genetically influenced). The modest concordances between parents and children may challenge a general pessimism about the ability of children to follow healthier trajectories than their overweight parents, and suggest that far more than the family environment drives the current obesity epidemic.

Unanswered questions and future research

Establishing national and international repositories of representative body composition data would allow near-real time detection of shifts in prevalence in response to policy changes and other levers, and support future healthcare provision and economic modelling. The ultimate goal remains interventions—whether driven by politics, policy or practice—that reduce obesity and lead to healthier body composition. Unfortunately, at the present time, the ’optimal' body composition at differing stages of the lifecourse remains unknown as it relates to a range of important outcomes. Defining this requires large longitudinal population studies incorporating family triads, biospecimens and relevant exposures and disease outcomes/proxies, including the potential for Mendelian randomisation studies. Novel intervention strategies may be informed by parents and children non-concordant for adiposity.


This paper uses unit record data from Growing Up in Australia, the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. The study is conducted in partnership between the Department of Social Services (DSS), the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) electronic data capture tools were used in this study. More information about this software can be found at: The authors would like to thank the LSAC and CheckPoint study participants, staff and students for their contributions. The authors would also like to thank Dr Katherine Lange for her assistance with the figures and analyses.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
  49. 49.
  50. 50.
  51. 51.
  52. 52.
  53. 53.


  • Contributors SC is the CheckPoint’s Project Manager, and refined the analysis plan and drafted the initial manuscript. ANG is a study research assistant, and refined the analysis plan and drafted the initial manuscript. TO is a study investigator involved in the conception and oversight of the Child Health CheckPoint, and provided expert advice and critical review of this manuscript. ACG is a study biostatistician, and conducted and refined the analyses and provided critical review of this manuscript. MW is the Principal Investigator of the Child Health CheckPoint, and provided expert advice and critical review of this manuscript.

  • Funding This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (Project Grants 1041352, 1109355), The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation (2014-241), the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (MCRI), The University of Melbourne, the National Heart Foundation of Australia (100660) and the Financial Markets Foundation for Children (2014-055, 2016-310). MW was supported by the NHMRC (Senior Research Fellowship 1046518) and Cure Kids New Zealand. The MCRI administered the research grants for the study and provided infrastructural support (IT and biospecimen management) to its staff and the study, but played no role in the conduct or analysis of the trial. The Department of Social Services played a role in study design; however, no other funding bodies had a role in the study design and conduct; data collection, management, analysis and interpretation; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Research at the MCRI is supported by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

  • Disclaimer The findings and views reported in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to DSS, AIFS or the ABS.

  • Competing interests All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at and declares financial support as described in the funding section.

  • Ethics approval The Child Health CheckPoint study protocol was approved by The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Human Research Ethics Committee (33225D) and Australian Institute of Family Studies Ethics Committee (14-26).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children datasets and technical documents are available to researchers at no cost via a licence agreement. Data access requests are co-ordinated by the National Centre for Longitudinal Data. More information is available at

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.