Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Factors influencing access to kidney transplantation: a research protocol of a qualitative study on stakeholders’ perspectives
  1. Katja Kloss1,
  2. Sohal Ismail1,
  3. Steef Redeker1,
  4. Lothar van Hoogdalem1,
  5. Annemarie Luchtenburg1,
  6. Jan J V Busschbach1,
  7. Jacqueline van de Wetering2
  1. 1 Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2 Nephrology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lothar van Hoogdalem; l.vanhoogdalem{at}erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

Introduction Unequal access to kidney transplantation is suggested, but no systematic inventory exists about factors influencing access to kidney transplantation. There is an absence of any research that has combined stakeholder perspectives along the complete trajectory of transplantation. The present qualitative study explores the contributing factors from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in this trajectory, including patients, health professionals and health insurance and financial representatives in the Netherlands. Moreover, stakeholders will be invited to suggesting strategies and solutions for handling the facilitating and hindering factors found. By means of interaction, stakeholder groups will arrive at a consensus for new policymaking in the field of a Dutch transplantation care.

Methods and analysis The different stakeholders’ perspectives and possible solutions will be explored by interviewing in three phases. In the first phase, stakeholders’ group perspectives will be explored with individual interviews and focus group interviews without confrontation of views from other perspectives. In the second phase of focus group interviewing, perspectives will be confronted with the other stakeholders’ perspectives assessed. Finally, in the third phase, stakeholders will be invited to focus group discussions for suggesting solutions to overcome barriers and promote facilitators for improving access to transplantation. Approximately, groups from six to twelve participants per focus group and four to maximal six focus groups will be held per stakeholder, depending on the level of saturation, as prescribed by grounded theory. The interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and qualitative data will be analysed according to the principles of grounded theory supported by using NVivo software.

Ethics and dissemination The Medical Ethical Committee of Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, has approved this study. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and major international conferences.

  • kidney transplantation
  • renal replacement therapy
  • qualitative research
  • focus groups
  • health services accessibility
  • health policy
  • policy maker
  • nephrologist
  • nurse
  • social worker
  • health insurance

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JJVB, SYI, JvdW and SR made substantial contributions to conception and design. KK, SYI, JJVB, AL, LEvH and JvdW have been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding This research is funded by Dutch Kidney Foundation.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.