Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Sickness absence and disability pension before and after first childbirth and in nulliparous women: longitudinal analyses of three cohorts in Sweden
  1. Charlotte Björkenstam1,
  2. Cecilia Orellana2,
  3. Krisztina D László1,
  4. Pia Svedberg1,
  5. Margaretha Voss1,
  6. Ulrik Lidwall1,3,
  7. Petra Lindfors4,
  8. Kristina Alexanderson1
  1. 1 Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2 Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3 Department of Analysis and Forecast, Swedish Social Insurance Agency, Stockholm, Sweden
  4. 4 Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Krisztina D László; krisztina.laszlo{at}ki.se

Abstract

Objective Childbirth is suggested to be associated with elevated levels of sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP). However, detailed knowledge about SA/DP patterns around childbirth is lacking. We aimed to compare SA/DP across different time periods among women according to their childbirth status.

Design Register-based longitudinal cohort study.

Setting Sweden.

Participants Three population-based cohorts of nulliparous women aged 18–39 years, living in Sweden 31 December 1994, 1999 or 2004 (nearly 500 000/cohort).

Primary and secondary outcome measures Sum of SA >14 and DP net days/year.

Methods We compared crude and standardised mean SA and DP days/year during the 3 years preceding and the 3 years after first childbirth date (Y−3 to Y+3), among women having (1) their first and only birth during the subsequent 3 years (B1), (2) their first birth and at least another delivery (B1+), and (3) no childbirths during follow-up (B0).

Results Despite an increase in SA in the year preceding the first childbirth, women in the B1 group, and especially in B1+, tended to have fewer SA/DP days throughout the years than women in the B0 group. For cohort 2005, the mean SA/DP days/year (95% CIs) in the B0, B1 and B1+ groups were for Y−3: 25.3 (24.9–25.7), 14.5 (13.6–15.5) and 8.5 (7.9–9.2); Y−2: 27.5 (27.1–27.9), 16.6 (15.5–17.6) and 9.6 (8.9–10.4); Y−1: 29.2 (28.8–29.6), 31.4 (30.2–32.6) and 22.0 (21.2–22.9); Y+1: 30.2 (29.8–30.7), 11.2 (10.4–12.1) and 5.5 (5.0–6.1); Y+2: 31.7 (31.3–32.1), 15.3 (14.2–16.3) and 10.9 (10.3–11.6); Y+3: 32.3 (31.9–32.7), 18.1 (17.0–19.3) and 12.4 (11.7–13.0), respectively. These patterns were the same in all three cohorts.

Conclusions Women with more than one childbirth had fewer SA/DP days/year compared with women with one childbirth or with no births. Women who did not give birth had markedly more DP days than those giving birth, suggesting a health selection into childbirth.

  • sick leave
  • disability pension
  • childbirth
  • cohort study
  • postpartum
  • pregnancy
  • child delivery

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors CB conducted the analyses, wrote the first draft and revised the paper. CO contributed to analyses and revised the paper. KDL contributed to writing, interpretation of the findings and revised the paper. PS and KA contributed to the conception and design of the study, interpretation of the findings and revised the paper. MV, UL and PL contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of the findings and revised the paper. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding This work was supported by the AFA Insurance (grant number 160318).

  • Disclaimer The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, or analysis of the data, interpretation of the results, writing of the paper nor in decisions about the manuscript submission.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The project was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board of Stockholm. The Ethical Review Board waived the requirement that informed consent of research subjects should be obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available.