Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Interventions and practice models for improving health and psychosocial outcomes of children and young people in out-of-home care: protocol for a systematic review
  1. Emma Galvin1,
  2. Renée O'donnell1,
  3. Helen Skouteris1,2,
  4. Nick Halfpenny3,
  5. Aya Mousa1
  1. 1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2School of Business, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  3. 3Policy and Research, MacKillop Family Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Helen Skouteris; helen.skouteris{at}monash.edu

Footnotes

  • Contributors EG developed the search strategy, wrote the first draft of the review protocol and lead the data collection and analysis. AM contributed to the design and scope of the search strategy, guided the review process and revised and edited the manuscript. RO and NH contributed to the revision and editing of the manuscript. HS determined the design and scope of the review, revised and edited the manuscript, supervised in the review process and is the guarantor for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the review data.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors EG developed the search strategy, wrote the first draft of the review protocol and lead the data collection and analysis. AM contributed to the design and scope of the search strategy, guided the review process and revised and edited the manuscript. RO and NH contributed to the revision and editing of the manuscript. HS determined the design and scope of the review, revised and edited the manuscript, supervised in the review process and is the guarantor for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the review data.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.