Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Qualitative case study investigating PAX-good behaviour game in first nations communities: insight into school personnel’s perspectives in implementing a whole school approach to promote youth mental health
  1. Yu Qi Wu1,
  2. Mariette Chartier1,
  3. Gia Ly1,
  4. Ari Phanlouvong1,
  5. Shelby Thomas1,
  6. Jonathon Weenusk2,
  7. Nora Murdock3,
  8. Garry Munro2,
  9. Jitender Sareen4
  1. 1 Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  2. 2 Cree Nation Tribal Health Centre Inc, The Pas, Manitoba, Canada
  3. 3 Department of Instructional Services, Manitoba First Nations Education Resource Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  4. 4 Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mariette Chartier; Mariette_chartier{at}cpe.umanitoba.ca

Abstract

Objectives PAX-Good Behaviour Game (PAX-GBG) is associated with improved mental health among youth. First Nations community members decided on a whole school approach to facilitate PAX-GBG implementation, by offering intervention training to all staff members in their schools. Our objective is to gain a greater understanding of how this approach was viewed by school personnel, in order to improve implementation in remote and northern First Nations communities.

Design We conducted a qualitative case study using semi-structured interviews.

Setting Interviews were conducted in First Nations schools located in northern Manitoba, Canada, in February 2018.

Participants We used purposive sampling in selecting the 23 school staff from First Nations communities.

Intervention PAX-GBG is a mental health promotion intervention that teachers deliver in the classroom alongside normal instructional activities. It was implemented school-wide over 4 months from October 2017 to February 2018.

Outcome measures We inquired about the participants’ perception of PAX-GBG and the whole school approach. We applied an iterative coding system, identified recurring ideas and classified the ideas into major categories.

Results Implementing the PAX-GBG whole school approach improved students’ behaviour and created a positive school environment. Students were learning self-regulation, had quieter voices and demonstrated awareness of the PAX-GBG strategies. All teachers interviewed had used the programme. Support from school administrators and having all school personnel use the programme consistently were facilitators to successful implementation. Challenges included the timing of training, lack of clarity in how to implement and implementing among students in older grades and those with special needs.

Conclusions The whole school approach to implementing PAX-GBG was viewed as an acceptable and feasible way to extend the reach of PAX-GBG in order to promote the mental health of First Nations youth. Recommendations included ensuring school leadership support, changes to the training and cultural and literacy adaptations.

  • MENTAL HEALTH
  • Community child health
  • PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
  • Child & adolescent psychiatry
  • PUBLIC HEALTH
  • QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • Use of qualitative interviews of 23 school personnel in three remote First Nations communities provided rich data to understand their perspectives on PAX-Good Behaviour Game enhancement implementation in the context of their communities.

  • Collaborating and co-learning with First Nations communities is important in improving mental health promotion sustainably while respecting the cultural and historical context of Indigenous people.

  • A limitation of this study is the potential positive bias of the researchers that may have resulted in the school personnel providing more positive feedback on PAX and limiting criticism of the programme.

Introduction

Rates of suicide among Indigenous youth are five to seven times higher than non-Indigenous youth in Canada, and one of the highest suicide rates in the world.1–3 One of Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)’s call to action is to close the health equity gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people using health indicators such as suicide rates.4 Decades of discrimination, assimilation, oppression and marginalisation have adversely marked countless Indigenous families and eroded the traditional way of life.5 6 However, the damage does not remain in the past, the harmful effects are likely to extend to subsequent generations unless effective measures are taken.1 To improve Indigenous well-being, we must take into account the contemporary and historical-cultural context of Indigenous communities, and approach health improvement using a collaborative and holistic view that encompasses a balance of spiritual, mental, emotional, physical and social well-being.6 7

A programme that holds promise to closing the health equity gap is the PAX-Good Behaviour Game (PAX-GBG). GBG, developed by Barrish and colleagues,8 is a mental health promotion intervention that teachers deliver in the classroom setting alongside the normal instructional activities. PAX-GBG is an enhancement of GBG designed to improve the students’ social-emotional competence and behaviour through improved academic achievement,9 reduced aggressive and criminal behaviours,10–12 decreased tobacco, alcohol and drug use13 and decreased use of services for problems with emotions, behaviours or drugs and alcohol.9–14 Most importantly, it is one of the few evidence-based approaches that reduce suicide attempts in youth.15 The intervention helps strengthen the students’ self-regulation and behaviour management skills using strategies that engage the students and teachers to collaborate together in creating a positive learning experience. Currently, PAX-GBG implementation research examines individual and school level factors that affect the programme integration outcomes.16 17 Diverse international populations have achieved positive outcomes in implementing PAX-GBG.18 19 Yet, there is a paucity of research on implementing PAX-GBG in Indigenous communities. Adopting the programme in Indigenous communities requires attention to the unique challenges that First Nations’ communities face: high teacher turnover rate, small and mixed grade classrooms and geographical disconnect between schools. Understanding the implementation of programme that promote mental health and prevent suicides is crucial in ensuring programme effectiveness.

As described above, evidence-based community interventions with promising suicide-reduction outcomes are available.15 20 However, without proper implementation that considers the real-world context of Indigenous communities, the interventions may fail to yield positive outcomes.21 22 Implementation science refers to the process of integrating evidence-based interventions within a specific setting in order to benefit population health.22 23 Implementation strategies are often used, which are the set of systematic processes, activities, resources used to adapt interventions into practice.24 There are several important aspects of implementation: fidelity (adherence to original intervention), dosage (frequency and duration of delivering the intervention), quality (degree of excellence of the components of the programme conducted), participant responsiveness (degree the programme stimulates interest in participants), programme differentiation (degree the programme is distinguished from others), monitoring of control/comparison conditions, programme reach (rate of participant involvement) and adaption (programme modification and reinvention).21 25

We found a unique opportunity to address the programme implementation research gap in the province of Manitoba, Canada. In 2011, Manitoba conducted the first province wide cluster randomised control trial (RCT) for all interested grade I classrooms to adopt PAX-GBG into their curriculum in effort to decrease suicide rate through early mental health promotion. Academic researchers have partnered with First Nations communities, the government of Manitoba and PAX-GBG developers to collaboratively explore PAX-GBG’s implementation and determine if enhancements were required. First Nations community members recommended two enhancements of PAX-GBG: the whole school approach and the Dream Makers approach. The whole school approach involves training all school staff in using PAX-GBG in their classrooms and all school activities, thereby better aligning it with the socio-cultural context of the remote communities. The Dream Makers approach is still being evaluated and will be reported in a separate paper. The PAX-GBG trainers travelled to the northern communities and provided a 2 day training to teachers from Kindergarten to Grade 8. In two of the three schools, the trainers also demonstrated how PAX-GBG was actually used in the community’s classroom.

The objective of this study is to examine the perspective of school personnel on the implementation of the PAX-GBG whole school approach. Implementation research is essential in understanding how evidence-based mental health promotion programme are being used within real-world remote and northern contexts. The insights gained can be used to support the application of PAX-GBG into practice and improve the mental well-being of youth.

Methods

This qualitative study used a case study design, the case being the PAX-GBG intervention. A case study is an appropriate design for both in-depth exploration of a programme such as PAX-GBG, and of evaluation the implementation of an intervention. We conducted in-depth one-on-one interviews of school staff involved in implementing PAX-GBG in First Nations schools located in Manitoba, Canada. Specifically, participants were asked about their overall impressions of the whole school approach, the benefits and challenges of implementation, the PAX-GBG training and changes they would recommend. Content analysis of the extensive interviews helped gain a holistic perspective on the reception and real-world practices of PAX-GBG whole school approach. The standards for reporting qualitative research reporting guidelines were used.26 This study was approved by the University of Manitoba’s Health Research Ethics Board, Winnipeg, Manitoba, and written informed consent was obtained by all participants.

Study setting and sample

In Canada, the term ‘Indigenous’ includes First Nations, Métis and Inuit people. This study focuses on First Nations peoples comprising 10.5% of Manitoba population, which is the highest proportion among the Canadian provinces. On the First Nations communities’ recommendation, three schools implemented PAX-GBG in Kindergarten to Grade 8 classrooms in northern and remote communities in the province of Manitoba, Canada. The school personnel were trained in how to use the PAX-GBG approach in their schools and were expected to begin implementing school wide after the training. The principal of each school invited school personnel to share their experience voluntarily with the research team. The interviewees included three principals, 17 teachers, one educational assistant (EA) and two resource teachers who were employed in one of the three schools. The majority (14) of the participants interviewed taught the early years students (Nursery to Grade 3), and five worked in the middle years (Grade 4 to 8), only one in high school (Grade 9 to 12) and the three principals oversaw all grade levels. Of those interviewed, there were 15 school staff members who attended the 2-day PAX-GBG whole school training conducted in October 2017 in their own schools, six staff members attended the regular PAX-GBG training in a major centre, two of which also attended the PAX-GBG whole school training. Only two staff members did not attend any training in PAX-GBG.

Four female researchers made up the research team: the principal investigator has a PhD, the research associate has a MSc with experience in qualitative research, the graduate student has training in qualitative interviews and the medical student was new to interviewing. The students were Indigenous and the others were not. Other than discussions with the school leadership about the project, the interviewers had no prior contact with the participants. Although the research team has no vested interest in PAX, they began the study with a positive attitude towards the programme based on previous research results and evidence in literature.

Data collection

We conducted 23 in-depth, semi-structured, open-ended one-on-one interviews in February 2018 at the three schools. The interviews were evenly distributed across the three schools and lasted between 15 min to 45 min. During data collection, the participant and one or two researchers were present. Each interviewer explained the purpose of the interview and had a structured interview guide with prompting questions for consistency (see online supplementary appendix A). The interviews were audio taped and transcribed verbatim. The research team unanimously agreed that this study had reached data saturation because no new information emerged nearing the end of each interview day. Field notes were made after the interviews and no repeat interviews were conducted. We did not return the transcripts to the participants; however, we shared the themes and subthemes with some of the participants for feedback to ensure accuracy.

Analytical strategy

The research team (three members) conducted the line-by-line analysis of the individual transcripts. Initially, the data was grouped according to the interview questions. Then, all the results were compiled and categorised into major categories. Six main categories and 20 subcategories emerged from our analysis of the interviews. Techniques used to ensure validity included obtaining the perspectives of classroom teachers, resource teachers and principals, reaching consensus on the categories by two researchers and confirming them by a third research and member checking with a subsample of the participants.

Patient and public involvement

Through a series of community meetings, First Nations community members were involved in developing the research proposal, including the research objectives and design. These members were either band leadership, service providers, school personnel or simply interested members of the community. Some members were part of monthly team meetings overseeing the study and some sat on the PAX Adaptation committee that reviewed the results and provided context to ensure the findings were interpreted accurately. They recommended the expansion of PAX-GBG in their communities, identifying areas of interest regarding implementation and encouraging school staff in participating. However, they were not involved in conducting or analysing this study. The research team has shared and discussed these results with a working committee at an annual meeting, which included three members of eight First Nations communities, and at a national conference. All participating sites and partner communities have received a newsletter and a two-page summary of the study results.

Results

The school personnel shared their thoughts and experiences with the research team regarding (1) overall impression of PAX-GBG, (2) impact of PAX-GBG, (3) implementation of the PAX-GBG whole school approach, (4) facilitators to implementation, (5) challenges to implementation and (6) PAX-GBG training, as shown in table 1.

Table 1

Summary of major themes and subthemes

Overall impression of PAX-GBG

Improved student behaviour

Participants were generally receptive towards implementing PAX-GBG in their classrooms, finding that it created a positive school environment and improved students’ behaviour. School personnel noted that PAX-GBG was effective in improving the student’s attitude, the loudness of their voice and their self-control as well as more order in the hallways. One teacher commented that ‘the kids are friendlier and … they don’t tease as much, and they follow the rules better … it’s just more peaceful’. (S1-I5)

Positive school environment

In terms of a positive school environment, several commented on how students were having fun in class and enjoying themselves in school. Some of their comments also suggest that PAX-GBG has provided teachers with new skills for improving the classroom environment. One teacher noted, ‘this one student said, I can’t believe like we’re having fun in school, ‘cause he’s so used to a strict routine of just sitting there doing work, doing work, and not playing or doing anything, making things fun’ (S1-I5). Others commented on its positive influence:

Just that’s it’s more positive and kind of get the kids to think about themselves and what you’re doing or what your group is doing and instead of more punishment, like put your heads down or turn the lights off or all these different things. (S2-I6)

School staff can be influenced by how other educational staff view the programme thereby making them less receptive to PAX-GBG. One of the teachers spoke about hearing negative comments about PAX-GBG from staff in a different school before she was trained. However, her impressions changed after she attended the training herself.

They were talking about PAX, how they were trying to promote it into the schools and … like the math specialist, the ELA specialist, all those specialist people wanted, they didn’t agree with the programme because they were saying that you’re rewarding kids and they don’t believe in rewarding kids for good and bad behaviour. (S2-I4)

Then when I went into the training I got a good idea of it and I was like, no, its not negative, its good.(S2-I4)

Impact of PAX

Participants also discussed the changes they observed within their own classrooms and throughout the school as shown in table 2. Most noted that the observed changes were positive. The most common observations mentioned were that students were learning self-regulation, control over their voices and increased awareness of PAX strategies. However, some participants mentioned that they had observed only few changes. As one person said, ‘well there’s a few I guess, it is improving a little bit, but I don’t think everybody’s following through with it’ (S3-I6). They found that some teachers are still raising their voices to get the attention of the students, rather than using the PAX-GBG strategies. The school bus was mentioned as a place where misbehaviour was noticed.

Table 2

Observed changes in school after the implementation of PAX whole school approach

PAX-GBG is being implemented

Almost all study participants indicated use of PAX-GBG; however, the frequency of PAX use varied. Unfamiliarity with PAX-GBG was a reason that some participants were only beginning the implementation of PAX-GBG:

The initial training was good as is and it’s just a matter of getting out there and trying a little by little… you don’t just go in the next morning and…I’m using PAX, that’s it. It doesn’t work like that for anything. (S3-I2)

They’re a lot more comfortable, like there were people who had no clue what PAX was. And I think they’re more comfortable and I’m sure, like when you get a chance to question them you’ll find that it’s mainly positive. The only holdback might be because I’ve had previous training I was more aware of it, so somebody coming in totally new at it and having a whole classroom to do it with might make a difference you know. But it was very positive, they were very positive I think. (S3-I2)

All participants with the exception of one have used a PAX-GBG strategy since they were trained in October 2017. The PAX-GBG strategies are described in online supplementary appendix B. However, it is clear that the PAX-GBG strategies are used to varying degrees. Of the 17 classroom teachers, few were using the full range of strategies. PAX harmonica was most often mentioned among the seven PAX-GBG strategies, followed by the PAX Sticks, PAX Vision Exercise and PAX hands and feet. While many school staff have used several strategies, in some cases they were not used as intended. The benefits and challenges with some of the strategies are explained below. Table 3 shows staff’s perspectives on the PAX strategies.

Table 3

PAX strategies implemented in the school

PAX vision exercise

Nearly half of the participants mentioned the vision exercise and spoke positively when describing their experiences. A few mentioned that they had not facilitated the exercise. One teacher noted it was challenging to motivate her students to participate in this exercise.

PAX-GBG, Granny’s Wacky Prizes and the term ‘spleems’

Some teachers spoke about how well their students responded to the PAX-GBG and Granny’s Wacky Prizes. A few teachers spoke about counting spleems (disruptive behaviour), however, many had not started counting them in their classrooms Many of the teachers who played the game made some modifications to adapt it to their classroom and culture. Of those who did not play the game, unfamiliarity, lack of class time and the dislike of the word ‘spleem’ restricted the game from being played.

PAX harmonica and PAX quiet

Most of the participants used the harmonica; however, a few used it less often because of the small class size. While describing their experiences with the harmonica, several teachers spoke about the use of the peace sign and how it is useful in getting the student’s attention. Interestingly, one person spoke about how the harmonica can help with student safety.

PAX sticks

Several teachers spoke about using the PAX sticks and how well their students responded to the strategy. The teachers felt the strategy helped students, particularly shy students, gain confidence to interact with others. One use of the PAX sticks is to randomise the likelihood a student is called to answer a question, other teachers have used the PAX sticks to help them choose a helper or leader.

Tootle notes

Tootle notes appeared to be used in varying degrees. A few teachers had their classes write notes on a regular basis while others used them once a week or during special occasions. A teacher also used tootle notes to help her with supporting students. However, some teachers are confronted with some challenges in implementing the strategy. Finding the time to write the Tootles notes for some teachers appeared to be a large undertaking. They felt that using the Tootles would add another responsibility to their already full schedules.

PAX posters and PAX hands and feet

PAX posters were mentioned to help students’ learn about appropriate noise levels. Only a few teachers spoke about their experiences with PAX Hands and Feet. These teachers described their use of this strategy positively.

Facilitators of PAX implementation

Administrative support

School personnel discussed important aspects on effectively implementing PAX-GBG. Many of the participants mentioned that it was crucial to have the support of the school administration, especially the principal’s support. As one teacher described, ‘the teachers had that support from the staff and the principal brought it in, actually the PAX training for everyone and encouraged everyone to attend it and just made it real fun and informative workshop. And then she encouraged them to use, and we helped and they offered help and they still do, they were still about helping people get started and maintained in their programming. So with that support, that’s an important part too.’ (S3-I2)

Consistency among school personnel

Some staff members mentioned that it was easier to implement PAX-GBG because all staff have been trained and the message to students was consistent. Other staff members supported the PAX-GBG whole school approach because it made implementing the programme easier for the teachers and provided consistency for the students. As one staff members noted, ‘Because it was everybody together the initial training and then everybody was using it, you know it’s consistent so I noticed it.’ This consistency was frequently mentioned as crucial to successful programme implementation, ‘It works, but you have to be consistent every day. You can’t just say, oh we’re going to do PAX and then not follow through. And you have to explain to the kids how the programme works, like when you blow the mouth organ for quiet and the voice the PAX voice, all the charts are up and they know, and even on the door PAX hands are on there, the posters are all up. And they all know that, so you have to teach the kids how it works before you can do it and be consistent every day and follow through with it, because if you don’t then it will just, it will just fall through, it won’t work for you in the classroom management, so it’s (Whole School Approach) very good for that’ (S3-I6).

Challenges of PAX implementation

As shown in table 4, participants raised four major challenges from their experience in implementing PAX-GBG. First, many school staff view the PAX programme as being designed for younger children, and not age appropriate for the older grades, indicating the need for modifying the materials and the training for teachers in older grades. It should be noted that the programme has been previously used in older grades in the USA. Second, starting the training in October made it difficult for teachers to revise their curriculum schedules to include the programme. Third, some teachers voiced their lack of clarity on how to actually begin implementing PAX-GBG. Lastly, engaging special needs children into participating in the programme was regarded as difficult to do.

Table 4

School personnel’s challenges in implementing PAX-GBG whole school approach

PAX-GBG training

Participants shared their thoughts on the PAX-GBG training, which includes the lecture approach, trainer classroom visits and training EAs. Furthermore, participants gave feedback on areas of improvement, which can help inform future PAX-GBG training sessions.

First, the trainees appreciated the lecturing approach used in the PAX-GBG training because the trainers often integrated their personal experiences to enhance the participants’ learning. The real-world examples of working with children in First Nations communities helped the participants connect with the trainers and believe that implementing PAX in their schools is feasible. Training with colleagues made the training more enjoyable and fruitful because it was easier to interact with one another and share ideas. A teacher who attended both the regular training and whole school training felt that attending training with Winnipeg School Division teachers made her less at ease to interact with the other trainees.

Second, the participants thought the trainers’ visit to the teachers’ classrooms were very helpful because the trainers could observe their classroom dynamics and settings.

He like visited every class and he had really helpful tips and then he was saying like you know you don’t have to go too fast, just start with what you’re doing is good, just start with your harmonica and starting to talk about SPLEEMS and stuff like that. Which was good, so that was really nice, because I was thinking, oh no I’m not doing any of the games yet or any of the groups and then counting SPLEEMS, I didn’t have a base count or anything like that. So he was like, don’t rush into it, that’s part of, that it’s so flexible that you can just go at your own pace. (S2-I7)

Thirdly, a few teachers in one Swampy Cree Tribal Council (SCTC) school, which had the opportunity to train EAs, felt that training EAs helped make the PAX message consistent to all students.

I really liked that the EA’s … (attended) the whole (PAX) session and they felt good about that too ‘cause they, sometimes in the training we forget that and they do a lot of work, you know one on one and behavioural for sure, and classroom management and everything, they really need those skills because there’s a number of children they work with. (S3-I2)

Lastly, participants shared some challenges of the training and offered some possible solutions. As shown in table 5, areas of improvement included the setting, approach, frequency of the PAX training sessions and all staff training. Although the whole school training held at the school gym accommodated all trainees, participants felt that it was hard to hear in the large space.

Table 5

School personnel’s views on training challenges and recommendation on improving future PAX training

Discussion

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (2016) has prioritised closing the health equity gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, including on the measure of youth suicide.4 However, translating evidence-based mental health promotion interventions into practice requires careful attention to the historical and cultural context of First Nations communities. A key reason for this is the unique history and challenges that the communities face. While the main focus was Manitoba’s Swampy Cree Tribal Council communities, these study results have potential relevance for other Indigenous communities implementing mental health promotion interventions.

While previous studies have looked into teacher factors that influence PAX-GBG implementation outcomes and the effect of implementing the intervention on teachers,16 17 27 this study is the first to examine the perspective of school personnel in implementing PAX-GBG whole school approach enhancement. Consistent with previous research we found that programme implementation varied among providers.16 21 Based on the interview results, it appears that the level of PAX-GBG implementation (ie, the duration and frequency of using PAX-GBG strategies) is heavily dependent on the teacher’s motivation, confidence and familiarity in using the PAX-GBG strategies. There was a high degree of participant responsiveness as key informants and their students were receptive of the PAX-GBG whole school approach. The teachers were also receptive of PAX-GBG enhancement implementation because they observed improvement in student behaviour and school environment.

The majority of school personnel voiced that administrative support was essential in implementing PAX, especially the principal’s support. The principals’ leadership role is instrumental in prioritising the implementation of PAX in the school, as reflected in allocating resources and training.28 A previous study has found that teachers’ programme implementation level increases correspondingly when principals are made aware of their positive influence on programme implementation and are explicitly requested to encourage and monitor teachers.29 Additionally, principals’ willingness may serve in validating the initial acceptance of the intervention within the community and encourage teachers to adopt the programme.

Wehby has found that teacher burnout impedes intervention fidelity— a similar concern raised by the First Nations school staff.30 This impediment can be minimised with better teacher-trainer alliance.30 In terms of training improvements, the school staff recommended more training opportunities that start before the school staffs begin adhering to their planned curriculum. As Becker suggested, two-phased coaching model is more appropriate for teachers with a variety of skill levels.31 In the two-phased coaching model, the initial phase (universal coaching phase) provides all learners the same coaching regardless of their skill level. In the second phase (tailored coaching phase), coaching is aimed at meeting the learners’ needs and working with the learners’ strengths. As the PAX enhancement expanded training for all school staff, the training needs to both (1) deliver a consistent message to everyone and (2) modify the training according to the specific needs of teachers of different grade levels. The universal coaching phase and tailored phase of the two-phased training model would address both concerns respectively.

In understanding the school staff’s perspective in implementing PAX-GBG whole school approach, we have gathered five major recommendations to help improve and ensure that PAX-GBG whole school training enhancement is successful. (1) Administrative support: The principal and administration of First Nations schools play a significant role in supporting the teachers as they show confidence in adopting the school-based health promotion programme, which influences the receptivity of school staff in implementing and enhancing the intervention. (2) Inclusive training: Expanding PAX-GBG training to all school staff seems to align with the communal value of First Nations communities and their holistic approach to health and well-being. Including EAs in future trainings will better ensure a consistent PAX implementation for special needs children and delivering a consistent message throughout the school. (3) Two-phased training: Two-phased training with hands-on workshops is recommended in accommodating the specific needs and responsibilities of different school staff. Starting the training early is important in helping the school staff integrate the intervention into their everyday practice. Frequent trainings rather than longer trainings are preferred. Further, a feedback mechanism is recommended in assuring school staff throughout the implementation process. To ensure intervention sustainability, regular feedback will aid in developing improvements. As many of the First Nations communities are remote, it would be pragmatic for teachers who use PAX less confidently to shadow those whom are more familiar with the intervention; co-learning may help encourage continuous learning when the trainers are not available. (4) Cultural adaptation: Cultural modifications are needed to increase the acceptability and use of more PAX games. Specifically, the names of the PAX strategies should be changed to fit the cultural context. (5) Literacy level adaptation: Specifically for Tootle notes, other means to share kind peer feedbacks are needed to overcome the literacy challenge. We propose using verbal and visual substitutes in integrating Tootle notes in lower literacy classrooms.

According to recent evaluations, PAX-GBG may build resilience in high-risk First Nations youth.32 However, special attention must be paid to delivering the resources appropriately in order to offset the cumulative effect of poverty, loss of culture and intergenerational trauma, which undermines childrens’ mental, emotional and social well-being.20 21 A failure to deliver high quality programme implementation will more likely result in diminished anticipated outcomes. Therefore, this study has taken an important step in providing a holistic foundation of knowledge to help develop effective methods of PAX-GBG implementation enhancements that eases the transition of adopting a validated intervention into real-world practice.

Strengths and limitations

A key strength of this study is the contribution it makes to a deeper awareness and understanding of the school staffs’ perspective on PAX-GBG enhancement implementation in the context of First Nations communities. Collaborating and co-learning with First Nations communities is important in improving mental health promotion sustainably while respecting the cultural and historical context of Indigenous people. Considering the holistic approach of health in Indigenous communities, it is imperative to understand the school staff’s perspective of PAX-GBG implementation enhancement. Studies have indicated that adaption (modification or reinvention of interventions that does not alter the core principles of the programme) is an important aspect of implementation.21 Although programme adaption may be viewed as a failure to achieve fidelity (adherence to the original intervention), we propose that programme modifications are conducive in achieving higher implementation dosage and maintain programme sustainability. When the ‘fit’ of an intervention aligns with the school staff’s values and beliefs, there is a higher level of implementation.16 28 As proposed by Durlak, focusing on cultural factors in implementation is fundamental to suit the needs and values of specific ethnic populations.21 Our study has considered the unique cultural and historical context of First Nations communities.

A limitation of this study may be the potential positive bias of the researchers. This bias may have resulted in the school personnel providing more positive feedback on PAX and limiting criticism of the programme. Another potential limitation of this study is in the reliance on school staff’s recall on reporting their impression and experience in implementing PAX-GBG enhancement. Obtaining the points of view of not only classroom teachers, but also principals and resource teachers helped to mitigate this limitation.

Conclusion and future directions

The whole school approach to implementing PAX-GBG was viewed as an acceptable and feasible way to extend the reach of PAX-GBG in order to promote the mental health of youth in northern and remote First Nations communities. It also has identified the real-world challenges that school staff face in incorporating PAX-GBG into their practice within rural and remote First Nations communities. This valuable information has provided a basis on which future research and improvement strategies can be identified and developed. Some recommendations to strengthen the approach include ensuring that the school leadership understand PAX-GBG and support their staff, inclusive training of all school personnel, use of two phased training and making cultural and literacy adaptation to the programme. More research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these additional supports and adaptations. Also, while previous research found GBG to be effective at improving mental health and academic outcomes in youth in the USA, whether it is beneficial specifically for First Nations youth has yet to be shown. Ensuring culturally and contextually appropriate PAX-GBG implementation will improve the likelihood that First Nations youth will benefit from this evidence-based programme and improve their life-long mental well-being.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to recognise the contribution of the Swampy Cree Tribal Council community members in the conception of this study. The authors met with them over three annual meetings and informally when needed throughout the study. Their guidance has been pivotal in shaping the study protocol. We also recognise the continued support and guidance of the staff at the Cree Nation Tribal Health Centre. The authors acknowledge the generosity and openness of the government partners at Healthy Child Manitoba who fund PAX-Good Behaviour Game (PAX-GBG) in the province of Manitoba and are committed to working with the communities to understand the implementation and evaluation of this intervention. The authors are grateful for the guidance, time, effort and funding that the Manitoba First Nations Education Resource Centre and the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch has provided. Finally, the authors extend our gratitude to the PAXIS Institute for their generosity, creativity and enthusiasm in adapting and enhancing PAX for the benefit of Indigenous people.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors YQW had the responsibility of writing the manuscript and contributed to the analyses and interpretation of the data. All authors have reviewed and approved the manuscript. MC and GL contributed to all aspects of study. AP contributed to analyses and interpretation of the data. ST and JW contributed to the design, acquisition and interpretation of the data. NM, GM and JS contributed to the conception, design and interpretation of the data.

  • Funding Preparation of this article was supported by a 3-year Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Team Grant, grant number P12-144646: Pathways to Health Equity for Aboriginal People – Implementation Research Team Grants – Component 1 – Suicide Prevention (Chartier, Sareen & Munro).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the University of Manitoba’s Health Research Ethics Board, Winnipeg, Manitoba. ID# HS19857 (H2016:248).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement No additional data are available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.