Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of fetal growth restriction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
  1. Alessandra Bettiol1,
  2. Niccolò Lombardi1,
  3. Giada Crescioli1,
  4. Laura Avagliano2,
  5. Alessandro Mugelli1,
  6. Claudia Ravaldi3,4,
  7. Alfredo Vannacci1,4
  1. 1 Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  2. 2 Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital Medical School, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
  3. 3 Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  4. 4 CiaoLapo - Charity for Healthy Pregnancy, Stillbirth and Perinatal Loss Support, Prato, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alfredo Vannacci; alfredo.vannacci{at}unifi.it

Abstract

Introduction Fetal growth restriction (FGR) includes different conditions in which a fetus fails to reach the own full growth, and accounts for 28%–45% of non-anomalous stillbirths. The management of FGR is based on the prolongation of pregnancy long enough for fetal organs to mature while preventing starvation. As for pharmacological management, most guidelines recommend treatment with low-dose aspirin and/or with heparin, although this approach is still controversial and innovative promising therapies are under investigation. As no firm evidence exists to guide clinicians towards the most effective therapeutic intervention, this protocol describes methods for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NetMA) of pharmacological treatments for FGR prevention.

Methods and analysis We will search MEDLINE and Embase for clinical trials and observational studies performed on gestating women with clinically diagnosed risk of FGR. Experimental interventions will include heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin, acetylsalicylic acid, antiplatelet agents, phosphodiesterase type 3 and 5 inhibitors, maternal vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy, nanoparticles, microRNA, statins, nitric oxide donors, hydrogen sulphide, proton pump inhibitors, melatonin, creatine and N-acetylcysteine, and insulin-like growth factors, compared between each other or to placebo or no treatment. Primary efficacy outcome is FGR. Secondary efficacy outcomes will be preterm birth, fetal or neonatal death and neonatal complications. For the safety outcome, all adverse events reported in included studies and experienced by either mothers, fetuses or newborns will be considered. Two review authors will independently screen title, abstract and full paper text, and will independently extract data from included studies. Where possible and appropriate, for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes, a NetMA will be performed using a random-effects model within a frequentist framework. Adverse events will be narratively described.

Ethics and dissemination Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and by scientific congresses and meetings.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42019122831.

  • fetal medicine
  • maternal medicine
  • preventive medicine
  • clinical pharmacology
  • perinatology

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AB, NL and GC designed the study, drafted the PROSPERO protocol and the manuscript. LA, AM, CR and AV contributed to study design and provided critical revisions on the manuscript. As this is a protocol paper, the research has not yet been conducted, no data have been acquired or interpreted.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.