Article Text

Download PDFPDF

CareTrack Aged: the appropriateness of care delivered to Australians living in residential aged care facilities: a study protocol
  1. Peter D Hibbert1,2,
  2. Louise K Wiles1,2,
  3. Ian D Cameron3,
  4. Alison Kitson4,
  5. Richard L Reed5,
  6. Andrew Georgiou1,
  7. Len Gray6,
  8. Johanna Westbrook1,
  9. Hanna Augustsson1,
  10. Charlotte J Molloy1,2,
  11. Gaston Arnolda1,
  12. Hsuen P Ting1,
  13. Rebecca Mitchell1,
  14. Frances Rapport1,
  15. Susan J Gordon4,
  16. William B Runciman1,2,
  17. Jeffrey Braithwaite1
  1. 1 Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2 Australian Centre for Precision Health, Cancer Research Institute, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  3. 3 John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
  4. 4 College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
  5. 5 Flinders University General Practice and Primary Health Care, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
  6. 6 Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Jeffrey Braithwaite; jeffrey.braithwaite{at}


Introduction The aged population is increasing rapidly across the world and this is expected to continue. People living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) represent amongst the sickest and frailest cohort of the aged population, with a high prevalence of chronic conditions and complex comorbidities. Given the vulnerability of RACF residents and the demands on the system, there is a need to determine the extent that care is delivered in line with best practice (‘appropriate care’) in RACFs. There is also a recognition that systems should provide care that optimises quality of life (QoL), which includes support for physical and psychological well-being, independence, social relationships, personal beliefs and a caring external environment. The aims of CareTrack Aged are to develop sets of indicators for appropriate care and processes of care for commonly managed conditions, and then assess the appropriateness of care delivered and QoL of residents in RACFs in Australia.

Methods and analysis We will extract recommendations from clinical practice guidelines and, using expert review, convert these into sets of indicators for 15 common conditions and processes of care for people living in RACFs. We will recruit RACFs in three Australian states, and residents within these RACFs, using a stratified multistage sampling method. Experienced nurses, trained in the CareTrack Aged methods (‘surveyors’), will review care records of recruited residents within a 1-month period in 2019 and 2020, and assess the care documented against the indicators of appropriate care. Surveyors will concurrently assess residents’ QoL using validated questionnaires.

Ethics and dissemination The study has been reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Macquarie University (5201800386). The research findings will be published in international and national journals and disseminated through conferences and presentations to interested stakeholder groups, including consumers, national agencies, healthcare professionals, policymakers and researchers.

  • geriatric medicine
  • audit
  • clinical audit
  • quality in health care

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

View Full Text

Statistics from


  • Contributors JB and PDH initiated the project and led the NHMRC grant proposal. JB, PDH, IC, AK, RR, AG and LG co-led all design aspects and shared in the development of the protocol and the initial drafting of the grant application and protocol. Drawing on the JB, PDH grant proposal, HA, LKW, GA and HPT did the first drafting of the protocol manuscript. JW, CJM, RM, FR, SJG and WBR helped to write the grant proposal, protocol and manuscript, and all the authors reviewed all revisions.

  • Funding This work was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Project (Grant No.: 1143223).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) approval has been granted from Macquarie University (5201800386).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; peer reviewed for ethical and funding approval prior to submission.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.