Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Understanding of and perceptions towards cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors: a qualitative study among residents of urban informal settings in Nairobi
  1. Frederick Murunga Wekesah1,2,
  2. Catherine Kyobutungi2,
  3. Diederick E Grobbee1,
  4. Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch1,3
  1. 1Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
  2. 2Health and Systems for Health, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya
  3. 3Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of theWitwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  1. Correspondence to Frederick Murunga Wekesah; wekesah{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives The study explored the understanding of and perception towards cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors, and how they influence prevention and development of the conditions, care-seeking and adhering to treatment.

Setting Informal settlements of Nairobi.

Participants Nine focus group discussions consisting of between six and eight purposively sampled participants were conducted among healthy individuals aged 20 years or older. A total of 65 participants (41 female) were involved.

Results Poverty, ignorance and illiteracy promoted behaviours like smoking, (harmful) alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and unhealthy diet, implicated in the development of obesity, diabetes and hypertension. Some respondents could not see the link between behavioural risk factors with diabetes, hypertension and stroke and heart attacks. Contaminated food items consumed by the residents and familial inheritance were factors that caused CVD, whereas emotional stress from constant worry was linked to hypertension, stroke and heart attacks. Few and inadequately equipped public health facilities were hindrances to treatment seeking and adherence to treatment for CVD conditions. Lack of medication in public health facilities was considered to be the single most important barrier to adherence to treatment next to lack of family support among older patients.

Conclusion Interventions to prevent and manage CVD in low-resource and urban poor settings should consider perceptions and understanding of risk factors for CVD, and the interrelationships among them while accounting for cultural and contextual issues for example, stigma and disregard for conventional medicine. Programmes should be informed by locally generated evidence on awareness and opportunities for CVD care, coupled with effective risk communication through healthcare providers. Screening for and treatment of CVD must address perceptions such as prohibitive cost of healthcare. Finally, social determinants of disease and health, mainly poverty and illiteracy, which are implicated in addressing CVD in low-resource settings, should be addressed.

  • epidemiology
  • cardiovascular diseases
  • urban poverty
  • risk
  • perception
  • treatment adherence

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors FMW, DEG, CK and KKG conceptualised and planned for the study. FMW took charge of the data collection and data processing. DEG, CK and KKG supported the analysis, write-up and review of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript for submission.

  • Funding This study was supported by a Global Health Support Scholarship of the University Medical Center, Utrecht to FMW.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by the scientific and ethics review unit sitting at the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) on 6 April 2017 (Ref KEMRI/SERU/CPHR/0003/3430).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Data (transcripts) and coding schemes used in this paper are available on request from the corresponding author.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.