You are here

Responses

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Obstetrics and gynaecology
Research
Productivity loss due to menstruation-related symptoms: a nationwide cross-sectional survey among 32 748 women
Compose a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on: 28 May 2021
    RE: Productivity loss due to menstruation-related symptoms

    Schoep et al. evaluated age-dependent productivity loss caused by menstruation-related symptoms, which were measured in absenteeism (time away from work or school) and presenteeism (productivity loss while present at work or school), in women aged 15-45 years (1). Odds ratio (95% CI) of women under 21 years with menstruation-related symptoms for absenteeism was 3.3 (3.1 to 3.6). In addition, menstruation-related symptoms caused a great deal of lost productivity, and presenteeism contributed to lost productivity larger than absenteeism. I present an interventional study regarding productivity loss and menstruation-related symptoms.

    Song and Kanaoka conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the application for menstrual management in female workers, aged 20-45 years (2). The incidences of depression and dysmenorrhea were significantly lower than those of the non-intervention group in the third month. Although labor productivity and absenteeism varied, and there was no significant change in presenteeism, the aggregate of medical expenses, productivity loss, and application fee for the intervention group presented lower costs with 1,170 USD per individual. They concluded that the application was cost-effective and might reduce the incidence of dysmenorrhea and depression. They reported that presenteeism did not improve by this application. As the incidences of depression and dysmenorrhea were quite low in their population, there is a ne...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.