Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Anterior neck soft tissue thickness for airway evaluation measured by MRI in patients with cervical spondylosis: prospective cohort study
  1. Yongzheng Han1,
  2. Jingchao Fang2,
  3. Hua Zhang3,
  4. Mao Xu1,
  5. Xiangyang Guo1
  1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  2. 2 Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  3. 3 Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mao Xu; anae{at}163.com

Abstract

Objectives Anterior neck soft tissue thickness, usually measured by ultrasound, is increasingly being investigated to predict difficult laryngoscopy, but the results have not been validated. Considering the conflicting measurement data, different measuring body positions and lack of a standard ultrasound procedure, we used MRI to verify the efficacy of these popular ultrasonographic parameters.

Design Prospective cohort study.

Setting A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.

Methods We enrolled 315 adult patients who underwent cervical spinal surgery in Peking University Third Hospital from April to October 2016. We analysed MRI data to predict difficult laryngoscopy. Cormack–Lehane scales were assessed during intubation, and patients with a class III or IV view were assigned to the difficult laryngoscopy group.

Results Univariate analysis showed that male sex (p<0.01), older age (p=0.03) and body weight (p=0.02) were associated with difficult laryngoscopy. MRI data consisted of five common ultrasonographic variables used to predict difficult laryngoscopy, but none was a valuable predictor: skin to hyoid (p=0.18), skin to midpoint of epiglottis (p=0.72), skin to thyroid cartilage at the level of the vocal cords (p=0.10), skin to vocal cords (p=0.44) or skin to anterior to the trachea at the level of suprasternal notch (p=0.92). Adjusted by sex, age and body weight, none of the five MRI indicators had predictive value (p>0.05).

Conclusion The five most commonly studied ultrasonographic indicators of anterior soft tissue thickness appeared unreliable to predict difficult laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spondylosis. Further study is needed to validate the most valuable indicator to predict difficult laryngoscopy.

Trial registration number ChiCTRROC-16008598; Pre-results.

  • difficult laryngoscopy
  • cervical spondylosis
  • ultrasound
  • magnetic resonance imaging

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • YH and JF contributed equally.

  • Contributors YH and MX designed and coordinated the study, collected and interpreted data and drafted the manuscript. XG participated in the study design. JF participated in measuring radiological indicators. HZ analysed the data and performed statistical analysis. All authors discussed the results, and read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The present study was supported by the Capital Clinical Characteristic Applied Research Project (Z181100001718109) and Hospital Medical Research Foundation of Peking University Third Hospital (No. Y75485-05).

  • Disclaimer The funders were not involved in the study design, data analysis or manuscript preparation.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (IRB00006761-2015021).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement A full anonymised dataset is available from the corresponding author on request.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.