Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effects of yoga on well-being and healthy ageing: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (FitForAge)
  1. Josefine Östh1,
  2. Vinod Diwan2,
  3. Maria Jirwe3,4,
  4. Vishal Diwan5,
  5. Anita Choudhary6,
  6. Vijay Khanderao Mahadik6,
  7. Michaela Pascoe7,
  8. Mats Hallgren1
  1. 1 Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
  3. 3 Department of Health Promoting Sciences, Sophiahemmet Hogskola, Stockholm, Sweden
  4. 4 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  5. 5 Department of Public Health and Environment, International Centre for Health Research, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India
  6. 6 Department of Physiology, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India
  7. 7 Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mats Hallgren; mats.hallgren{at}ki.se

Abstract

Introduction Due to ageing populations worldwide, the burden of disability is increasing. It is therefore important to develop interventions that improve healthy ageing, reduce disability onset and enhance life quality. Physical activity can promote healthy ageing and help maintain independence, yet many older adults are inactive. Yoga is a form of physical activity that aims to improve health and may be particularly suitable for older adults. Research indicates positive effects of yoga on several health-related outcomes; however, empirical studies examining the benefits of yoga on well-being among the elderly remain scarce. This study protocol reports the methodology for a 12-week yoga programme aimed to improve health and well-being among physically inactive older adults.

Methods and analysis Three group parallel, single-blind randomised controlled trial. Two comparison groups are included: aerobic exercise and a non-active wait-list control. In total, 180 participants aged 65–85 years will be recruited. Assessments will be performed at baseline and postintervention (12-week follow-up). The primary outcome is subjective well-being. Secondary outcomes include physical activity/sedentary behaviour, mobility/fall risk, cognition, depression, anxiety, mood, stress, pain, sleep quality, social support and cardiometabolic risk factors. Data will be analysed using intention-to-treat analyses, with mixed linear modelling.

Ethics and dissemination This study is approved by the Ethical Review Board in Stockholm (2017/1862-31/2). All participants must voluntarily agree to participate and are free to withdraw from the study at any point. Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant prior to inclusion. Results will be available through research articles and conferences. A summary of key results will be publicly available through newspaper articles.

Trial registration number DRKS00015093, U1111-1217-4248

  • ageng
  • yoga
  • well-being
  • physical activity
  • aerobics
  • sedentary behaviour
  • cognition
  • randomised controlled trial

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This is the first randomised controlled trial to explore the effects of yoga on well-being compared with a physically active and inactive control group among elderly adults.

  • Inclusion of both active and inactive control groups enables comparison of the effects on several levels, including indirect effects of the yoga intervention.

  • All exercise will be free of charge, instructor-led and undertaken at established fitness centres, decreasing the risk of adverse events.

  • Generalisability of study findings may be limited by a healthy entrant bias.

  • Subjective measurements of physical activity could overestimate activity levels.

Background

Populations are ageing globally, leading to new public health challenges. Within this demographic transition, it is estimated that the number of people aged ≥60 years will increase from 900 million in 2015 to 1400 million by 2030,1 thus increasing the prevalence of non-fatal disabilities such as mental, behavioural and musculoskeletal disorders.2 Many of the commonly experienced health problems among the elderly can be prevented or delayed by embracing a physically active lifestyle1; research in elderly populations shows that regular physical activity can benefit mood disorders, cognitive deficits, pain, mobility and increase independence.3

Despite these known benefits, levels of inactivity tend to increase with age.4 Approximately 30%–60% of adults aged ≥60 years across the WHO regions do not meet the recommended activity levels4; that is, ≥150 min of moderate-intensity or 75 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity (or an equivalent combination) per week.5 Activity levels among younger adults are showing a similar trend; in 2016, more than one-third of adults were inactive according to recent WHO global estimates based on self-reported data (n=1.9 million; 168 countries).6 Thus, relatively little progress has been made to reduce global inactivity levels6 which has major health impacts on non-communicable diseases (NCDs)7 and constitutes the fourth leading risk factor for mortality.5

A recent review indicates that older adults are interested in and able to engage in physical activity interventions.8 For many, physical activity is a means to enhance well-being and functional abilities that help maintain independence and life quality.9 Well-being is a multidimensional concept which includes physical, psychological and social components10 and low ratings of subjective well-being are associated with higher prevalence of chronic disease and lower life quality among the elderly.11 Similarly, activity levels are shown to predict subjective well-being among older adults12–14 which in turn is associated with healthy ageing and longevity.1 11

Yoga is an increasingly popular form of physical activity15 and refers to a unity of the body, mind and spirit.16 Recent research indicates beneficial effects of yoga on several health outcomes affecting elderly adults, including balance and mobility,17–19 cardiometabolic health,20–23 cognition,24–26 sleep quality and quality of life.27 Yoga practice has also been associated with better subjective well-being28–30 and improved mental health outcomes such as depression and anxiety.31 32 With few exceptions, however,19 25 27 33 the evidence base supporting yoga for older adults consists of exploratory, feasibility or pilot studies, often with small sample sizes and methodological weaknesses. Hence, there is a need for rigorously designed and adequately powered community-based trials of yoga which include assessments of diverse health outcomes.

Rationale

While aerobic exercise is recommended for the prevention of several NCDs,7 yoga’s emphasis on flexibility and balance may help to reduce the risk of fall-related injuries,17–19 which are prevalent among older adults and a leading cause of injury-related hospitalisation.34 Healthy ageing does not merely correspond to longevity, but also optimising well-being.11 With a holistic focus that includes physical, mental and spiritual well-being, yoga could be a suitable and appealing health maintaining activity for adults who find aerobic exercise difficult or impractical.35 While previous trials have compared the effects of yoga with non-active controls,36 none have compared the effects of yoga on subjective well-being to aerobic training and a non-active (wait-list) condition among older adults.

Study objective

This controlled trial aims to examine the effects on well-being of a 12-week yoga intervention, focused mainly on physical postures and movements, among healthy but physically inactive Swedish adults aged 65–85 years. Results will be compared with an equivalent duration aerobic exercise programme and wait-list control group.

Research questions

  • What are the effects of a 12-week yoga intervention on subjective well-being in older adults, compared with aerobic exercise and non-active wait-list control?

  • Can yoga improve health outcomes that are highly prevalent among older adults?

  • Does yoga participation affect total physical activity levels or sedentary behaviours?

  • Does yoga affect cognitive functioning in older adults?

Hypotheses

We hypothesise that (1) compared with aerobic training, participation in yoga will be associated with small magnitude improvements in self-reported well-being, and equivalent magnitude improvements on all secondary outcomes; (2) compared with non-active control, yoga will be associated with moderate magnitude improvements on all outcomes.

Trial design

The protocol is drafted in accordance with Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials37 (see Research checklist).

We propose to conduct a three-group parallel, single-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT). Assessments will be performed at baseline and after 12 weeks (see figure 1, participant flowchart based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines for transparent reporting of trials38).

Figure 1

Participant flowchart for parallel design, based on the CONSORT guidelines38 for transparent reporting of trials. BMI, body mass index; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; HRV, heart rate variability.

Methods

Study setting

The study will take place in Stockholm County at established fitness centres (FCs) with several facilities throughout Stockholm. The coordination and assessments of outcomes will be performed at the Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet.

Eligibility criteria

To be eligible for this study, participants must be between 65 and 85 years of age, have residence in Stockholm County, be fluent in Swedish and be willing to participate.

Exclusion criteria

  • Physical disability, disease or injury that could interfere with or be worsened by physical activity (eg, paralysis, inability to sit, stand and/or walk, severe pain, obstructive disease, glaucoma) or a severe cognitive deficit (eg, dementia). Severe cognitive deficiency will be assessed based on two questions: ‘Do you have troubles with your memory that affects your daily life?’ and ‘Do you have a diagnosis for dementia?’ Cognition will be measured as a secondary outcome, using verbal fluency (see Secondary outcomes, below). For this assessment, we are guided by the mean values in Tallberg et al 39 and will exclude those with values <21.5 for word fluency, 12.1 for animal fluency and 8.5 for verb fluency.

  • Extensive surgery the past year, or planned the coming year.

  • Insulin-dependent diabetes (those with fasting venous blood glucose levels ≥5.6 mmol/L will be advised to seek advice at their local primary healthcare centre but can still participate), blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg systolic, ≥100 mm Hg diastolic (blood pressure will be measured in sitting position twice in each arm) or irregular pulse.

  • Advised not to participate in moderate exercise by their doctor.

  • Recently diagnosed with serious mental illness (eg, psychosis or bipolar disorder) or indicating acute signs of suicidality (eg, recent and ongoing thoughts of death/suicide).

  • Currently or recently (past 3 months) engaged in regular structured exercise, on average 2 days/week or more.

  • Simultaneously taking part in another research study.

Interventions

Yoga

Participants randomised to the yoga group will receive a free 3-month membership at a FC offering supervised group senior yoga classes for older adults with the aim of improving flexibility, core strength and balance. The 60-min classes (also available to adults not part of the study) are considered suitable and safe for older adults and beginners. Classes will be offered at multiple locations and several times during the week using a standardised format to reduce the risk of intervention variability. Participants will meet a personal trainer (PT) before commencing yoga classes, encouraged to attend classes three times a week during the intervention period and to perform yoga at home at those occasions they cannot make it to the FC. The length of the intervention is consistent with other yoga-based interventions for older adults.15

The senior yoga intervention is based on Hatha yoga, which consists of gentle physical postures (asanas), plus breathing exercises and limited meditation. Hatha yoga is considered particularly suitable for older adults.40 The opening postures include cat/cow pose, mountain pose and partial sun salute. Thereafter, classic Hatha yoga postures are instructed, including chair pose, plank, tree pose, warrior I and II, downward facing dog, side stretch, spine twist, cobra pose and bridge pose. The finishing series includes relaxation exercises; dead man’s pose and relaxation.41 A detailed description of these movements can be found elsewhere.40 Classes will be delivered by qualified yoga instructors employed at the FC.

Aerobic exercise

Participants in the aerobic exercise group will receive a free FC membership for 3 months and advised to participate in supervised group aerobic training classes suitable for older adults. All classes are offered by the same FCs providing the yoga intervention. Classes will include cycling/spinning, indoor/Nordic walking, dancing and aerobics. Participants will undertake aerobic exercise three times per week for 60 min each session and complete a weekly exercise diary. If the participants cannot make it to the FC three times weekly, they will be prompted to exercise at home. Thus, the location, frequency and duration of aerobic exercise will be matched with the yoga group. Participants will meet a PT before commencing exercise. All exercise classes will be delivered by qualified fitness instructors employed at the FC. Classes will also be available to adults not taking part of the study.

Wait-list

Participants randomised to the non-active comparison group will be wait-list controls. At inclusion, they will be instructed to continue their daily activities as usual (eg, without engaging in regular structured exercise). They will complete an exercise diary at the end of the 12-week study. As an incentive, these participants will receive a FC card valid for 3 months when they attend their postintervention assessment.

Measures to maintain adherence

Participants will be recruited based on their address and proximity to the FC to minimise travel time and encouraged to contact a research assistant to discuss any issues relating to study adherence. Scheduled meetings will be preceded with text messages or phone calls 1 day before. Moreover, all participants in the two physical activity arms will receive one 30 min face-to-face sessions with a qualified PT; at the beginning of the intervention. The purpose of the PT meeting is to make the participants familiar with the FC, the booking system and to make an exercise plan for the 12 weeks based on the prerequisites of each participant in order to minimise the risk of injury. Evidence suggests that supported exercise interventions lead to better adherence than non-supported interventions.42 43 Participants will complete a weekly exercise diary and attendance at the yoga and aerobic classes will be recorded electronically when participants enter the FCs. All classes will be offered free of charge and all study participants will be offered a 20% discount on full year membership at the FC after completion of their postintervention assessments.

Outcome variables

Primary outcome variable

  • Subjective well-being will be measured using the short version of Life Satisfaction Index, version Z44–46; a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that aims to evaluate well-being and healthy ageing using five core components; zest, resolution and fortitude, congruence between desired and achieved goals, positive self-concept and mood tone.47

  • The 5-item Satisfaction with Life Scale measuring global judgments of one’s life satisfaction48 49 will also be used to assess subjective well-being.

Secondary outcome variables

  • Physical activity and sedentary behaviour will be subjectively assessed using the 4-item International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)50 51 and the 5-item Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire.52

  • Mobility and fall risk will be objectively assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale—a validated measure of balance53 54 and fall risk.55

  • The verbal fluency test will objectively assess executive function, attention and information processing speed,39 including categorical and letter fluency.56

  • Self-reported depression will be assessed by the 20-item Geriatric Depression Rating Scale.57 58

  • Self-reported anxiety will be assessed using the 20-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y2.59 60

  • The Profile of Mood States Questionnaire (POMS) will be used to assess mood and psychological distress.61 62 The 30-item POMS includes six subscales; tension–anxiety, vigour–activity, fatigue–inertia, depression–dejection and confusion–bewilderment.

  • Subjective stress (past month) will be assessed by the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale.63 64

  • The Brief Pain Inventory short form (9-items) will be used to assess pain severity and how pain interferes with daily life.65 66

  • Sleep quality during the past 2 weeks will be measured using the 7-item self-reported Insomnia Severity Index.67 68

  • The 9-item version of the Interview Schedule for Social Interactions short form will examine the availability of the social relations.69 70

  • Blood pressure, resting heart rate, body mass index, waist–hip ratio, heart rate variability, complete blood count, blood glucose and blood lipids and saliva cortisol will be collected to assess cardiometabolic risk factors.

  • Borg rating of perceived exertion scale will be used to assess exercise intensity.71 It will be handed out to the participants in the two physical activity arms at half-time and assessed by the participant immediately after three different exercise sessions.

The abovementioned measures of life satisfaction, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, depression, anxiety, mood, stress, pain, sleep quality and social support are validated in Swedish.

Sample size

The sample size calculation is based on the effect size seen in a previous 6-month RCT comparing the effects of beginners Iyengar yoga with light walking.19 Using this study as a guide, a standardised mean difference (effect size) of around 0.2 on the primary study outcome (well-being) is anticipated, favouring the yoga group compared with aerobic training. Based on these parameters, with 80% power, two-tailed significance for the primary between-group comparisons (yoga vs aerobic exercise), an expected drop-out rate of 20%72 and 1:1:1 allocation, a total sample of 180 participants is estimated.

Recruitment

Participants will be recruited by postal invitation and newsletter advertisements. A list of potentially eligible participants will be randomly generated by Statistics Sweden, based on age and residential status (eg, proximity to the gym, living within 3 km distance of the FC). Recruitment will occur during the first year of the trial in three waves. Those interested in participating will contact a research assistant who, after a brief telephone screening, will arrange a meeting to evaluate eligibility.

Randomisation and blinding

A statistician (external to the study) will generate a randomisation list using a random number computer programme. The list will be kept confidential and will only be unblinded in the event of participant withdrawal or adverse events. The allocation sequence will be transferred into separate sealed envelopes by a research assistant not part of the study team. These envelopes will be opened by research assistants together with the participant immediately following the baseline assessment. Treatment allocation will not be concealed from study participants nor the study coordinator. The study participants will be requested not to discuss their treatment allocation at follow-up meetings, when a different research assistant blinded to group allocation will be responsible for collecting data. Allocation will be kept confidential and only unblinded in the event of participant withdrawal or adverse events.

Data collection

Baseline assessment

The baseline assessment will be performed by trained research assistants prior to randomisation. The assessment covers demographic characteristics and collection of primary and secondary outcomes including anthropometric measurements, questionnaires and functional ability tests of mobility and cognition (see the Outcome variables section). Participants will receive referral for biological sampling at any of the Karolinska University laboratories and will receive a scheduled time for follow-up. Baseline assessments will take ~120 min.

Postintervention assessments

Each participant will be invited to a brief meeting of maximum 60 min with a research assistant at half-time (6 weeks) to discuss progress and to assess any possible adverse events associated with the intervention. Postintervention assessments of primary and secondary outcomes will be performed at 12+1 weeks (see Figure 2). This visit will take ~120 min.

Figure 2

Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments, according to SPIRIT 201337 guidelines. BMI, body mass index; SPIRIT, Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials; WHR, waist–hip ratio. 

Data management

Collected data will be kept confidential in participant case report forms (CRFs) and later transferred into electronic form (Microsoft Excel 2013). The principal investigator (MH) is responsible for maintenance of safely kept records and back-up of data. Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS V.22.0.

Statistical methods

Quantitative data will be collected and intention-to-treat analyses will be performed to examine effects of the yoga intervention, aerobic exercise active comparison group and the wait-list controls on the primary study outcome. A subanalysis will also be performed to investigate the effect of the recruitment cluster on the results. Missing data will be replaced using multiple imputation methods. The effects will be explored using mixed linear modelling, where group by time interactions will be reported with regression estimates, CIs and effect sizes (Hedges’ g). Sensitivity analyses will be performed. Moderating effects of gender and age will be examined, plus interaction effects of education level for cognitive outcomes.

Patient and public involvement

As the study consists of a non-clinical sample recruited from the general population, patients were not involved in the development of the trial protocol. The study design was informed by (1) expertise within the research group, which consists of researchers with experience in the design and evaluation of physical activity interventions for diverse groups, and (2) the existing literature describing yoga interventions for adults and elderly populations. Results from blood and saliva tests will be offered to individual participants at follow-up. All participants will complete a brief, semistructured interview at follow-up to assess their satisfaction with the trial. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific articles and through a layman’s summary published in the participating FC magazine, and on the FitForAge study website (to be established).

Assessment of harms

Trained research assistants will screen all potential participants and exclude those with health-related problems that might hinder participation or be worsened by physical activity. All adverse events will be recorded, evaluated and followed-up by the research assistants on a specific form in the CRF. Throughout the study, any adverse events needing medical care will be appropriately referred. Adverse events will be formally assessed at half-time (6 weeks) and at postintervention (12+1 weeks), and participants will be instructed to inform the study coordinator of any experienced adverse events throughout the study. Decision of participant or study discontinuation will be taken by the principal investigator.

Time plan

Planned recruitment start: January 2019. Planned study end: January 2021.

Discussion

Increasing physical activity levels within community settings is a significant public health priority. Physically inactive older adults who are considering a new exercise regime require updated information about the relative benefits and risks of different physical activities. This community-based RCT will explore the effects on health and well-being of a 12-week yoga intervention among physically inactive older adults (65–85 years). These effects will be compared with aerobic exercise, which is recommended for general health, and wait-list control. The physical activity programmes will be structured and supervised at established FCs in Stockholm, which will facilitate replication in other settings.

Interventions involving yoga are generally considered safe73; adverse events are rare but may include muscle strains and soreness.73 To reduce these risks, all exercise sessions will be designed for older adults and delivered by qualified instructors and PTs with experience in physical activity prescription.

Potential strengths of the study are the inclusion of two comparison groups which will enable the effects of yoga to be compared with an active and inactive control condition. Active comparison groups should, whenever possible, control for indirect effects of the intervention, such as social interaction, which could also influence the study outcome.74 Here, the aerobic exercise group will match the yoga group on potential moderators such as the duration and location of activity, social contact and frequency of exercise. Another potential strength is the use of standardised measures and blinded follow-up assessments, which minimises assessment bias. The primary study outcome, subjective well-being, is gaining more importance in ageing research, and is shown to be closely linked to health and quality of life in elderly populations.11 Some possible limitations are also acknowledged. Study generalisability may be affected to some extent by a ‘healthy entrant effect’ where only those individuals with positive attitudes or expectations towards physical activity express interest in participating. Subjective measures of physical activity tend to overestimate activity levels in adults75; however, the IPAQ is a commonly used and validated measure of activity, enabling comparisons across studies.

If findings demonstrate that yoga is effective in improving well-being, mobility, mood and cognition, it may have public health implications in terms of disease prevention and treatment. Although yoga is familiar to many people, its prescription for health conditions remains rare, in part due to the current lack of empirical support for its use. If appropriately disseminated, study findings could inform both individual and clinical decisions around exercise prescription for older adults. The study will also deepen current knowledge of yoga’s effects on health among older adults generally.

Ethics and dissemination

Consent to participate

Every potential participant will be informed about the study aims and procedures by a research assistant prior to participation, verbally and in writing. Confidentiality, voluntariness and freedom to withdraw from the study at any point will be stated. Written, informed consent will be obtained from all participants by a research assistant (online supplementary file 1).

Supplemental material

Confidentiality

Study participants will receive a unique study-ID at inclusion, based on the time of inclusion. Collected data will be coded and data will be stored in the CRF with the same ID which is considered source data. Collected data will be handled only by authorised people and will be directly reported into the participant CRF, kept in a locked archive at the Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet. The CRFs will be kept for 10 years after study end according to the standard guidelines at the Karolinska Institutet. Trial treatment randomisation codes will likewise be maintained confidential and codes broken only in case of adverse events or decision on discontinuation.

Data statement

The research protocol will be available at the institution’s website; https://ki.se/en/phs/intervention-research-at-the-epicss-group. Primary results and datasets will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Results will be reported on group-level only.

Dissemination policy

The results of the study will be publicly available in scientific media through research articles and conferences. A summary of key results will be publicly available for study participants and for lay people through newspaper articles.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
  49. 49.
  50. 50.
  51. 51.
  52. 52.
  53. 53.
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
  56. 56.
  57. 57.
  58. 58.
  59. 59.
  60. 60.
  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.
  64. 64.
  65. 65.
  66. 66.
  67. 67.
  68. 68.
  69. 69.
  70. 70.
  71. 71.
  72. 72.
  73. 73.
  74. 74.
  75. 75.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors MH and VinD conceived and designed the study. MH and JÖ wrote the first draft of the protocol - all co-authors contributed to subsequent revisions. JÖ is the project coordinator.

  • Funding This study is supported by Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE), grant number 2017-00024 awarded to MH. The funding body will play no role in the design and/or conduct of the study.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The study is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in Stockholm (Regionala Etikprövningsnämnden, number 2017/1862-31/2, amendment number 2018/2156-32).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.