Article Text
Abstract
Objectives To use the extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to predict smoking cessation counsellors’ intentions to offer smoking cessation support.
Design Cross-sectional study
Setting Taiwanese military
Participants A survey of 432 smoking cessation counsellors was conducted in 2017.
Primary and secondary outcome measures All participants completed a self-administered questionnaire that solicited information concerning demographics, smoking behaviour, self-rated suitability for being a counsellor, the knowledge and skills learnt from training courses and the TPB construct.
Results The factors of perceived behavioural control (β=0.590, p<0.001), self-rated suitability for being a counsellor (acceptable vs not suitable, β=0.436, p=0.001; suitable vs not suitable, β=0.510, p<0.001), knowledge (β=0.298, p=0.020) and professional specialty (military doctor vs non-military doctor, β=0.198, p=0.034) were found to be correlated with intention. However, attitude, subjective norms and descriptive norms were determined to be non-significant correlates. The model explained 59.7% of the variance for the intention to offer smoking cessation support (F[12,343]=44.864, p<0.001).
Conclusions To encourage smoking cessation counsellors to offer cessation support to smokers, policies should aim to increase their perceived behavioural control, knowledge and self-rated suitability for being a counsellor.
- theory of planned behaviour
- intention
- smoking cessation
- smoking cessation counsellors
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors SK, C-MC, F-GL and Y-LC designed the study and wrote the protocol. Y-LC, C-HL, S-LH, Y-WC and W-HF conducted literature searches and provided summaries of previous research studies. Y-LC and Y-CC conducted the statistical analysis. Y-LC wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to interpreting the results, and have approved the final manuscript.
Funding This research was supported by the Ministry of National Defense—Medical Affairs Bureau (MAB-106-088), Taiwan, ROC.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Ethical approval is provided by the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (1-106-05-029).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.798d8m6).
Patient consent for publication Obtained.