Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Understanding patient preference for physician attire in ambulatory clinics: a cross-sectional observational study
  1. Marc Zollinger1,
  2. Nathan Houchens2,
  3. Vineet Chopra2,3,
  4. Lauren Clack1,
  5. Peter Werner Schreiber1,
  6. Latoya Kuhn2,3,
  7. Ashley Snyder3,
  8. Sanjay Saint2,3,
  9. Christopher M Petrilli3,4,
  10. Hugo Sax1
  1. 1 Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  2. 2 VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  3. 3 Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  4. 4 Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Hugo Sax; hugo.sax{at}usz.ch

Abstract

Objectives We explored patient perceptions regarding physician attire in different clinical contexts and resultant effects on the physician–patient relationship.

Setting The 900-bed University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

Participants A convenience sample of patients receiving care in dermatology, infectious diseases and neurology ambulatory clinics of the University Hospital Zurich participated in a paper-based survey.

Primary and secondary outcome measures The survey instrument was randomised and showed photographs of male or female physicians wearing various forms of attire. On the basis of the respondents’ ratings of how the physician’s attire affected perceptions across five domains (knowledgeable, trustworthy, caring, approachable and comfort with the physician), a composite preference score for attire was calculated as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included variation in preferences by respondent characteristics and context in which care was provided.

Results Of 834 patient respondents (140 in dermatology, 422 in infectious diseases and 272 in neurology), 298 (36%) agreed that physician attire was important. When compared with all available choices, the combination of white scrubs with white coat was rated highest while a business suit ranked lowest. Variation in preferences and opinions for attire were noted relative to respondent demographics and the clinical setting in which the survey was administered. For example, compared with younger patients, respondents ≥65 years of age more often reported that physician dress was both important to them and influenced how happy they were with their care (p=0.047 and p=0.001, respectively).

Conclusions Outpatients at a large Swiss University hospital prefer their physicians to be dressed in white scrubs with white coat. Substantial variation among respondents based on demographics, type of physician and clinical setting were observed. Healthcare systems should consider context of care when defining policies related to dress code.

  • physician attire
  • patient perception
  • quality of care
  • questionnaire survey

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors 1a, conception; 1b,data acquisition; 1c, data analysis; 1d, data interpretation; 2a, manuscript drafting; 2b, manuscript revision; 3, final manuscript approval; and 4, being accountable for all aspects of the work. MZ: 1b, 1c, 1d, 2b, 3 and 4; NH: 1d,2a, 2b and 3; VC, SS and CMP: 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 2a, 2b, 3 and 4; LC: 1d, 2b, 3and 4; PWS: 1b, 1d, 2b, 3 and 4; LK: 1b, 1c, 1d, 2b and 3; AS: 1c, 1d, 2b and3; and HS: 1b, 1c, 1d, 2a, 2b, 3 and 4.

  • Funding This study was partially supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation grant (32003B_149474; PI, HS).

  • Disclaimer The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The necessity for a formal ethical evaluation of this study was waived by the Cantonal Ethics Review Board of Zurich, based on the Swiss law on research on humans (No. 60-2015).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Data are not available.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.