Article info

Download PDFPDF

A balanced approach to identifying, prioritising and evaluating all potential consequences of quality improvement: modified Delphi study

Authors

  • Madalina Toma Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre (SISCC), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Tobias Dreischulte Division of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UKNHS Tayside, Prescribing Support Unit, Dundee, UKInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Nicola M Gray Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre (SISCC), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Bruce Guthrie Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Madalina Toma; m.t.toma{at}dundee.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Toma M, Dreischulte T, Gray NM, et al
A balanced approach to identifying, prioritising and evaluating all potential consequences of quality improvement: modified Delphi study

Publication history

  • Received April 30, 2018
  • Revised January 16, 2019
  • Accepted February 6, 2019
  • First published March 23, 2019.
Online issue publication 
March 23, 2019

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.