Objective To assess the magnitude of suicide rates in the first week and first month postdischarge following psychiatric hospitalisation.
Design Meta-analysis of relevant English-language, peer-reviewed papers published in MEDLINE, PsycINFO or Embase between 01 January 1945 and 31 March 2017 and supplemented by hand searching and personal communication. A generalised linear effects model was fitted to the number of suicides, with a Poisson distribution, log link and log of person years as an offset. A random effects model was used to calculate the overall pooled rates and within subgroups in sensitivity analyses.
Outcome measures Suicides per 100 000 person years in the first week and the first month after discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation.
Results Thirty-four included papers comprised 29 studies that reported suicides in the first month postdischarge (3551 suicides during 222 546 patient years) and 24 studies that reported suicides in the first week postdischarge (1928 suicides during 60 880 patient years). The pooled estimate of the suicide rate in the first month postdischarge suicide was 2060 per 100 000 person years (95% CI=1300 to 3280, I2=90). The pooled estimate of the suicide rate in the first week postdischarge suicide was 2950 suicides per 100 000 person years (95% CI=1740 to 5000, I2=88). Eight studies that were included after personal communication had lower pooled rates of suicide than studies included after data extraction and there was evidence of publication bias towards papers reporting a higher rate of postdischarge suicide.
Conclusion Acknowledging the presence of marked heterogeneity between studies and the likelihood of bias towards publication of studies reporting a higher postdischarge suicide rate, the first week and first month postdischarge following psychiatric hospitalisation are periods of extraordinary suicide risk. Short-term follow-up of discharged patients should be augmented with greater focus on safe transition from hospital to community care.
PROSPERO registration number PROSPERO registration CRD42016038169
- risk management
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Strengths and limitations of this study
Published and previously unavailable data were synthesised to estimate rates of suicide in the first week and first month postdischarge following psychiatric hospitalisation.
Pooled rates of suicide were about 3000 and 2000 per 100 000 person years, respectively, in the first week and first month postdischarge.
Published studies reported higher suicide rates than data obtained by personal communication.
High between-study heterogeneity and the likelihood of publication bias towards studies with higher suicide rates may impact the generalisability of our estimated rates.
The period immediately following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation should be regarded as a distinct phase of care associated with an extraordinary suicide risk.
A recent meta-analysis of suicide mortality after discharge from psychiatric facilities estimated a rate of 484 per 100 000 person years among 100 studies reporting on suicides after any period of follow-up and 1132 suicides per 100 000 person years among 18 studies reporting on suicides in the first 3 months.1 These alarming figures suggest that the suicide rate among this vulnerable patient group is up to 100 times the global suicide rate and that being a recently discharged patient confers a higher risk of suicide death than any other risk factor.2 However, the earlier meta-analysis did not report estimates over periods shorter than 3 months1 because the methods used excluded the duplicated patient samples with a smaller number of patient years and no steps were taken to obtain further data by personal communication. As a result, the earlier study included only two studies that reported suicide rates in the first month post hospital discharge.1 Although several primary studies have reported on suicide in the immediate postdischarge period,3–5 expected rates of suicide in the first week and month of transition from the hospital to the community remain uncertain. Knowledge of the extent and trajectory of the suicide risk in the weeks following hospital discharge would inform the timing and duration of interventions aimed at reducing these tragic events.
The primary aim of this study was to calculate a pooled estimate and statistical dispersion (range, median and quartile values) of 1-week and 1-month postdischarge suicide rates. The secondary aim was to examine the possible moderators of the suicide rates over these two periods of follow-up according to the characteristics of the primary research.
The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO6 and conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses7 and Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology8 guidelines.
Search strategy and selection criteria
We included longitudinal studies that reported the number of person years and the number of suicides in the first week (1-week) and first month (or 28 days) postdischarge (1-month) from acute adult psychiatric hospitalisation. We defined acute adult psychiatric hospitalisation broadly so as to include hospitalisations of patients admitted with specific psychiatric diagnoses, psychiatric discharges of older people and after psychiatric hospitalisation in military settings. We excluded studies of postdischarge suicide after release from child and adolescent psychiatric wards, long-stay mental health wards, forensic psychiatric facilities and patients who were admitted to non-psychiatric settings (such as emergency departments or the medical or surgical wards of general hospitals). Studies were excluded if the number of suicides and the number of person years were not reported, could not be calculated or could not be obtained by email from the authors.
Two authors (DC and ML) independently searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase for relevant papers published in English between 01 January 1945 and 31 March 2017 (see figure 1, online supplementary 1). Electronic searches were supplemented by hand searches of the relevant review articles and the full-text papers located in the searches conducted for a related meta-analysis1 were re-examined. Grey literature was not considered. DC and ML independently winnowed titles, abstracts and full-text papers. The authors of studies that met inclusion criteria except for reporting postdischarge suicide rates over periods of longer than a month were contacted by email for data regarding suicides in the 1-week and 1-month periods. Authors of papers that reported postdischarge suicide in 1-month but not reported 1-week and the converse were also contacted. A total of 27 authors were contacted.
Supplementary file 1
SS and MW independently extracted the data and ML and DC performed a further check of the data. The number of person years was calculated using the number of discharges and the period of follow-up of 28 or 31 days when it was not directly reported in the paper. Where the follow-up was specified to be ‘1-month’, the length of follow-up was assumed to be 365/12=30.4 days. Separate figures were extracted for men and women and for the first and subsequent weeks of follow-up where possible.
A predetermined list of effect size and moderator variables was extracted. The variables collected were (1) number of suicides and number of patient years, (2) period of follow-up (1-month vs 1-week), (3) sex (where specified), (4) diagnostic group (where specified), (5) whether the primary study only included people admitted for suicidal thoughts and behaviours, (6) country in which the study was conducted, (7) whether the data were obtained by personal communication with the authors and (8) study quality items.
We assessed study quality using a 0–4-point scale derived from the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies9 and used in a previous meta-analysis of postdischarge suicide rates.1 One point was awarded if the study: (1) identified suicides using coroners’ records or a national mortality database (rather than using hospital records), (2) included all the postdischarge suicides in a defined geographic region (rather than suicides from a particular care setting), (3) included open verdicts in suicide numbers and (4) reported the number of discharges (rather than the number of individuals). Studies with a total quality score of three or four were regarded as being of higher quality.
The effect sizes of interest were the incidence rate (IR), expressed as suicides per 100 000 person years and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) between subgroups. In all analyses, a generalised linear mixed effects model was fitted to a count response (number of suicides), with a Poisson distribution, log link and log of person years as an offset allowing the inclusion of fitted values for zero suicide studies. All models included a random effect (intercept) for study. CIs were based on t-distribution with df equal to the number of studies. All models were fitted with the R package lme4. Standard errors were calculated using the delta method from the R package car. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted according to the period of follow-up, source of the data (published or obtained by personal communication), country of publication, sex and study quality using a mixed effects model.
Publication bias was examined by (1) comparing extracted data to that obtained by personal communication, (2) examination of funnel plots and (3) Egger’s regression tests based on the fitted values.
Patient and public involvement
The results of this study were discussed with Eastern Suburbs Mental Health Service, Consumer Advisory Group.
Search results and data extraction
Independent searches (DC and ML) both identified 24 of 26 papers reporting on suicides occurring in the first week or first month after discharge. A further eight studies were included after data were provided by personal communication with the authors, such that either 1-week or 1-month data or both periods were available from 34 papers (table 1, online supplementary 21). The earliest study was published in 1983, the median year of publication was 2009 and the most recent was published in 2017. Twenty-nine papers contained data pertaining to the first month postdischarge (online supplementary 3). Twenty-four papers reported on suicides in the first week postdischarge (online supplementary 4).
There were disagreements concerning six of the 68 data points relating to either the number of suicides or the number of patient years. All disagreements were resolved by a second examination of the data by DC and ML.
Suicides within a month of discharge
Twenty-nine studies (inclusive of four studies with no suicides) reported 3551 suicides in the first month after discharge during 222 546 person years. The mean number of suicides per study was 122 (SD=443) and the mean number of person years per study was 7674 (SD=22 581). The median sample suicide rate was 2333 per 100 000 person years with a range of 0–30 252 per 100 000 person years. The first and third quartiles were 601 and 4555 per 100 000 person years, respectively (see figure 2. Forest plot of suicide rates in 1 month following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation.). The pooled rate of 1-month postdischarge suicide was 2060 per 100 000 person years (95% CI=1300 to 3280) with very high between-sample heterogeneity (Q=266.8, p<0.001, I2=90) (table 2).
Separate data for men and women were available for 10 studies reporting 1-month postdischarge suicides including six studies obtained by personal communication. Men had almost twice the pooled rate of suicide than women (IRR=1.94, 95% CI=1.54 to 2.44; see table 2, online supplementary 5 and 6).
Studies of patients admitted for suicidal thoughts or behaviours had over three times the rate of suicide than studies of psychiatric patients who were not selected in this way (IRR=3.56, 95% CI=1.29 to 7.63), but this result was based on a small number of studies and suicides among patients presenting with suicidal thoughts or behaviours. The analysis of suicide rates according to diagnostic group was also limited by a small number of studies but suggested that groups of patients with a mood disorder might have higher rates of 1-month postdischarge suicide than groups of patients that were not selected by diagnosis (table 2).
The eight studies deemed to be of lower quality had a higher pooled suicide rate compared with the studies deemed to be of higher quality (IRR=1.99, 95% CI=1.98 to 2.01). The eight studies from Asian countries had the highest pooled suicide rate of suicide, followed by the 10 studies from European countries and the five studies from the UK, Canada, and Australia, while the six US studies had the lowest rate (table 2).
Excluding four studies that reported no suicides, 15 studies reported 1-month and 1-week suicides allowing a direct comparison of the suicide rates over the first week postdischarge to the remaining 8–31 days. Among these studies, the 1-week pooled suicide rate was almost three times the rate in the 8–31 days period (IRR=2.99, 95% CI=2.24 to 3.97; see table 2, online supplementary 7 and 8).
Data obtained from direct extraction from published papers had a significantly higher 1-month postdischarge suicide than the data obtained by personal communication (IRR=3.14, 95% CI=1.29 to 7.63). The funnel plot was characterised by eight studies with lower suicide rates than the pooled estimate and five studies with higher suicide rates than the pooled estimate lying outside the funnel (online supplementary 9). An Egger’s test confirmed the likelihood of publication bias towards studies with a higher postdischarge suicide rate (Egger’s bias=4.94, 95% CI=1.38 to 8.50, df=27, p<0.004)
Suicide rates in the first week postdischarge
Twenty-four studies were included in a meta-analysis of 1-week postdischarge suicide rates. These comprised 15 studies reporting suicides at both 1 month and 1 week (as above, table 2), five studies reporting suicides in 1 week but not in 1 month and four studies with no suicides. The 24 studies reported a total of 1928 suicides (mean=80.3 per study, SD=315.5 and median=8) during 60 880 person years (mean=25 360.7 per study, SD=7783 and median=174.5). The median sample suicide rate was 3186 per 100 000 person years (range 0–75 000 per 100 000, first quartile=567 and third quartile=6730).
The pooled 1-month postdischarge suicide rate was 2950 suicides per 100 000 person years (95% CI=1740 to 5000) with very high between-study heterogeneity (Q=186.4, p<0.0001, I2=88). (See table 3, figure 3. Forest plot of suicide rates in 1 week following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation).
Data extracted from published papers had a significantly higher rate of suicide than personally communicated data (IRR=3.63, 95% CI=1.55 to 8.49). The funnel plot was characterised by five studies with lower suicide rates than the pooled estimate and there were four studies with higher suicide rates than the pooled estimate lying outside the funnel (online supplementary 10). An Egger’s test confirmed the likelihood of publication bias towards studies with a higher postdischarge suicide rate (Egger’s bias=4.31, 95% CI=0.85 to 7.78, df=22, p<0.008).
Studies considered to have a lower quality had a higher rate of suicide than those assessed to have a higher quality (IRR=2.83, 95% CI=2.80 to 2.85).
This study synthesised over 30 years of research on suicide risk during the period immediately following psychiatric hospitalisation. The study builds on a previous meta-analysis of post psychiatric discharge suicide rates1 by including unpublished data and data that were excluded from an earlier meta-analysis of suicide rates postdischarge1 to estimate suicide rates over the first week and first month postdischarge. One-week postdischarge suicide rates were approximately 3000 suicides per 100 000 person years while 1-month rates were approximately 2000 per 100 000 person years. Rates from the beginning of the second week to the end of the fourth week or 1-month postdischarge were approximately 1000 per 100 000 person years. Rates of 2000–3000 per 100 000 person years are, respectively, about 200–300 times the global suicide rate.10 Our results also compare with a recent meta-analysis that estimated 1132 suicides per 100 000 person years among 18 studies of the first 3 months and 484 per 100 000 person years among 100 studies of any period of follow-up.1 This suggests a sixfold risk of suicide in the first week postdischarge compared with the long-term rates of suicide after psychiatric discharge of about 500 per 100 000 person years. It further suggests that length of time since discharge is at least as important as clinical risk factors for suicide (OR=1.50)11 and high-risk models for suicide (OR=4.84)12 reported in longitudinal studies.13
Our finding of higher rates of suicides by men in the immediate postdischarge period is unsurprising because of the preponderance of men among all suicide deaths,10 but is in contrast with less clear gender effects on inpatient suicide rates.14 15
The main limitation of our study is uncertainty about the extent to which our pooled estimates can be generalised. We observed very high between-study heterogeneity that may be partially explained by publication bias towards studies with high suicide rates and aspects of study quality. However, in all likelihood, there are real differences in postdischarge suicide rates between settings that cannot be examined using the existing literature. Most importantly, this study was not able to ascertain the role of the availability and the quality of postdischarge care in determining postdischarge suicide rates.
Our findings emphasise the importance of postdischarge follow-up. Currently, in the USA, only around half of the commercially insured patients and a third of Medicare patients received a psychiatric follow-up visit within 7 days of hospital discharge for a mental illness.16 In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines suggest that people discharged from mental health settings should be followed-up within 7 days.17 While the introduction of a 7-day follow-up period is one of a suite of measures that do seem to be associated with lower suicide rates in the UK,18 it is sobering to consider that some patients who are scheduled to be followed-up at the 7-day mark will die before they are ever reassessed.
Very high rates of suicide in the immediate postdischarge period should encourage clinicians to think carefully about the patient’s transition from hospital to the community. Qualitative research suggests that the transition from hospital to home is associated with re-emergence of pre-existing social stresses and new stresses associated with hospitalisation.19–21 Clinicians should consider strategies that might improve this transition, including predischarge and postdischarge patient psychoeducation, formal needs-based assessments, use of transitional care teams, improved communication between the inpatient team and greater involvement of the patient’s outpatient team and family.22
The high risk of suicide during the period immediately following hospital discharge provides a clinical rationale for conceptualising the first postdischarge month as a distinct phase of recovery and treatment, especially in the context of pervasive gaps in treatment following psychiatric hospitalisation. Traditional case management approaches to the continuity of care following psychiatric hospitalisation have not consistently yielded promising results. In one review, two of seven studies of telephone follow-up and one of five studies that involved facilitating communication between inpatient and outpatient clinicians resulted in a significant increase in continuity of care.22 Intensive interventions that involve home visits, social support, motivational interviewing and accompanying patients to outpatient appointments have yielded more encouraging results.23 24
Other limitations relate to the representativeness of the included studies. All of the research came from high-income economies of Asia, Australasia, North America and Europe, and our results might not be representative of postdischarge suicide in low-income and middle-income countries. Moreover, there were an insufficient number of studies to determine whether apparent differences in suicide rates between regions were real or simply the result of available studies. Differences between rates of postdischarge suicide between countries are plausible because of differences in national suicide rates,10 progress towards deinstitutionalisation25 and likely national differences in the quality of mental healthcare systems26.
Although it has been argued that one way of combatting postdischarge suicide is to focus on individual patients with clinical characteristics that signify a high suicide risk,27 28 the very high suicide rates calculated in this study and the known limitations of suicide risk assessment29 suggest that a narrow focus on clinical risk assessment might mislead clinicians into thinking that some recently discharged psychiatric inpatients can be regarded as being at low risk postdischarge.30 Our findings support an approach to suicide prevention focused on whole cohorts of discharged patients.13
The authors would like to thank the following authors who provided further information about their published studies of suicide after psychiatric hospitalisation: Dr Ebehard Deisenhammer, Dr Erkki Isometsa, Dr Ron Kessler, Dr Edith Liemburg, Dr Natalie Riblet and Dr Marcia Valenstein.
Contributors Study design: DC and ML. Data collection: DC, ML, MO, SS and MW. Data analysis: DH-P and ML. Interpretation and critical review: ML, MO and DH-P. Manuscript preparation: DC, DH-P, ML, MO, SS and MW.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests MO reports grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs, outside the submitted work.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement All the data are reported in supplementary materials.
Author note ML has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.