Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Correction: Measurement of coverage, compliance and determinants of uptake in a publicly funded rotavirus vaccination programme: a retrospective cohort study

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Rafferty E, Guo X, McDonald B, et al. Measurement of coverage, compliance and determinants of uptake in a publicly funded rotavirus vaccination programme: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031718.

This article was previously published with errors in Table 3.

  • In table 3, the data (1.93 (1.73 to 2.16)) is for ‘Rural-Q2’ instead of ‘Rural-Q1’ under the heading ‘Income and location of residence (interaction term)’.

  • In table 3, the first sub-heading under ‘Gestation age at birth’ should read ‘Term (≥36 weeks)’. Currently, these are split into two lines.

Table 3 columns headers should read as follows:

Column 4: Unadjusted OR for not initiating§ (95% CI)

Column 5: Adjusted OR for not initiating § (95% CI)

Column 8: Unadjusted OR for not completing¶ (95% CI)

Column 9: Adjusted OR for not completing¶,** (95% CI)

The footnotes to table 3 should read:

§: Odds of not being vaccinated with rotavirus vaccine compared with receiving at least one dose of the rotavirus vaccine.

¶: Odds of not being vaccinated with two doses of the rotavirus vaccine compared with receiving at least two doses of the rotavirus vaccine.

Linked Articles